Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Abecker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Abecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Abecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Abecker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Abecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Abecker. The network helps show where Andreas Abecker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andreas Abecker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andreas Abecker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andreas Abecker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andreas Abecker. Andreas Abecker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Abecker, Andreas, et al.. (2009). Automatic Population and Updating of a Semantic Wiki-based Configuration Management Database.. 3091–3105.2 indexed citations
7.
Zacharias, Valentin & Andreas Abecker. (2007). Explorative debugging for rapid rule base development.1 indexed citations
8.
Stojanović, Ljiljana, Andreas Abecker, Dimitris Apostolou, Gregoris Mentzas, & Rudi Studer. (2006). The Role of Semantics in eGovernment Service Model Verification and Evolution.. DSpace - NTUA (National Technical University of Athens). 117–128.1 indexed citations
9.
Apostolou, Dimitris, et al.. (2005). Challenges and directions in knowledge asset trading: Research Articles. Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance & Management. 13(1). 1–15.1 indexed citations
Grimm, Stephan, Steffen Lamparter, Andreas Abecker, Sudhir Agarwal, & Andreas Eberhart. (2004). Ontology based specification of web service policies. GI Jahrestagung (2). 579–583.6 indexed citations
12.
Abecker, Andreas, Ansgar Bernardi, & Ludger van Elst. (2003). Agent Technology for Distributed Organizational Memories: The Frodo Project.. International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. 3–10.24 indexed citations
13.
Mentzas, Gregoris, et al.. (2002). INTEGRATING KNOWLEDGE MODELLING IN BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 851–861.17 indexed citations
14.
Abecker, Andreas, Ansgar Bernardi, Ludger van Elst, et al.. (2002). Konzepte zur Gestaltung von Unternehmensgedächtnissen.. Künstliche Intell.. 16. 5–11.1 indexed citations
15.
Elst, Ludger van & Andreas Abecker. (2001). Integrating Task, Role, and User Modeling in Organizational Memories. The Florida AI Research Society. 295–299.4 indexed citations
Elst, Ludger van & Andreas Abecker. (2001). Ontology-Related Services in Agent-Based Distributed Information Infrastructures.. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 79–86.4 indexed citations
18.
Sintek, Michael, et al.. (2000). Using Ontologies For Advanced Information Access.2 indexed citations
Abecker, Andreas, Stefan Decker, & Otto Kühn. (1998). Organizational Memory - Das aktuelle Schlagwort.. Informatik-Spektrum. 21. 213–214.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.