Mark A. Scheel

3.3k total citations
8 papers, 115 citations indexed

About

Mark A. Scheel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark A. Scheel has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 115 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1 paper in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Mark A. Scheel's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (8 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (5 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers). Mark A. Scheel is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (8 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (5 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers). Mark A. Scheel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Mark A. Scheel's co-authors include Saul A. Teukolsky, Stuart L. Shapiro, Thomas W. Baumgarte, Gregory B. Cook, Nils Deppe, Harald Pfeiffer, Keefe Mitman, William Throwe, Michael Boyle and Jordan Moxon and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. D and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields.

In The Last Decade

Mark A. Scheel

8 papers receiving 111 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark A. Scheel United States	5	102	23	21	16	11	8	115
E. Parent Australia	4	92 0.9×	27 1.2×	15 0.7×	10 0.6×	3 0.3×	7	96
B. Vaishnav United States	2	77 0.8×	13 0.6×	11 0.5×	16 1.0×	11 1.0×	2	78
Kevin Barkett United States	5	116 1.1×	28 1.2×	20 1.0×	27 1.7×	6 0.5×	5	120
Divyajyoti India	5	82 0.8×	25 1.1×	13 0.6×	10 0.6×	9 0.8×	7	83
Z. L. Yang China	5	105 1.0×	14 0.6×	18 0.9×	12 0.8×	6 0.5×	12	112
A. Lenon United States	2	62 0.6×	15 0.7×	11 0.5×	12 0.8×	4 0.4×	3	65
E. K. Wessel United States	2	138 1.4×	25 1.1×	12 0.6×	29 1.8×	6 0.5×	2	139
L. Nieder United Kingdom	5	110 1.1×	46 2.0×	12 0.6×	17 1.1×	5 0.5×	9	114
Ish Gupta United States	6	76 0.7×	11 0.5×	16 0.8×	6 0.4×	5 0.5×	10	79
A. Bonino Italy	4	157 1.5×	34 1.5×	20 1.0×	36 2.3×	4 0.4×	4	157

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Scheel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Scheel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Scheel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Scheel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Scheel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Scheel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Scheel. The network helps show where Mark A. Scheel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark A. Scheel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark A. Scheel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark A. Scheel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark A. Scheel. Mark A. Scheel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Mitman, Keefe, Harrison Siegel, Mark A. Scheel, et al.. (2025). Probing the ringdown perturbation in binary black hole coalescences with an improved quasinormal mode extraction algorithm. Physical review. D. 112(6). 5 indexed citations

2.

Stein, Leo C., Keefe Mitman, Scott E. Field, et al.. (2025). High-precision ringdown surrogate model for nonprecessing binary black holes. Physical review. D. 112(2). 4 indexed citations

3.

Pfeiffer, Harald, Alessandra Buonanno, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, et al.. (2025). Highly accurate simulations of asymmetric black-hole scattering and cross validation of effective-one-body models. Physical review. D. 112(12). 1 indexed citations

4.

Siegel, Harrison, Keefe Mitman, M. Isi, et al.. (2025). Black hole spectroscopy for precessing binary black hole coalescences. Physical review. D. 111(6). 11 indexed citations

5.

Scheel, Mark A., et al.. (2025). Eccentricity reduction for quasicircular binary evolutions. Physical review. D. 111(8). 2 indexed citations

6.

Rüter, Hannes R., G. Carullo, Simone Albanesi, et al.. (2025). Late-Time Tails in Nonlinear Evolutions of Merging Black Holes. Physical Review Letters. 135(17). 171401–171401. 3 indexed citations

7.

Chen, Yitian, Michael Boyle, Nils Deppe, et al.. (2024). Improved frequency spectra of gravitational waves with memory in a binary-black-hole simulation. Physical review. D. 110(6). 8 indexed citations

8.

Baumgarte, Thomas W., Gregory B. Cook, Mark A. Scheel, Stuart L. Shapiro, & Saul A. Teukolsky. (1998). General relativistic models of binary neutron stars in quasiequilibrium. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 57(12). 7299–7311. 81 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact