Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Hollywood
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Hollywood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Hollywood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Hollywood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Hollywood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Hollywood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Hollywood. The network helps show where Mark A. Hollywood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark A. Hollywood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark A. Hollywood.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark A. Hollywood based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark A. Hollywood. Mark A. Hollywood is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sergeant, Gerard P., Mark A. Hollywood, & K. D. Thornbury. (2019). Spontaneous Activity in Urethral Smooth Muscle. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1124. 149–167.10 indexed citations
10.
Sergeant, Gerard P., K. D. Thornbury, Noel G. McHale, & Mark A. Hollywood. (2006). Interstitial cells of Cajal in the urethra. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 10(2). 280–291.42 indexed citations
Sergeant, Gerard P., Mark A. Hollywood, Karen D. McCloskey, Noel G. McHale, & K. D. Thornbury. (2000). Role of IP3 in modulation of spontaneous activity in pacemaker cells of the rabbit urethra. The Journal of Physiology.8 indexed citations
13.
Hollywood, Mark A., Gerard P. Sergeant, Karen D. McCloskey, N. G. McHale, & K. D. Thornbury. (2000). Effects of the IP3-induced Ca2+ release modulator 2-aminoethoxydiphenylborate on calcium-activated currents in interstitial cells isolated from the rabbit urethra. The Journal of Physiology.3 indexed citations
14.
Hollywood, Mark A., et al.. (1997). Ca2+-activated chloride currents in smooth muscle cells isolated from sheep urethra. The Journal of Physiology.2 indexed citations
15.
Hollywood, Mark A., et al.. (1997). Isolated sheep mesenteric lymphatic smooth muscle cells possess both T- and L-type calcium currents. The Journal of Physiology.14 indexed citations
16.
Hollywood, Mark A., et al.. (1997). Characterization of a calcium-dependent chloride current in isolated sheep mesenteric lymphatic smooth muscle cells. The Journal of Physiology.3 indexed citations
17.
Sergeant, Gerard P., et al.. (1997). The inhibitory effect of 5-HT on isolated sheep lymphatic vessels is blocked by penitrem A. The Journal of Physiology.2 indexed citations
18.
Hollywood, Mark A., et al.. (1996). Modulation by Cibacron Blue of Ca2+ dependent K+ current in isolated smooth muscle cells from the sheep bladder. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -). 165(4). 307–307.1 indexed citations
19.
Hollywood, Mark A., et al.. (1996). Membrane currents in isolated lymphatic smooth muscle cells of the sheep. The Journal of Physiology.1 indexed citations
20.
Hollywood, Mark A., et al.. (1996). Fast sodium current in isolated lymphatic smooth muscle cells of the sheep. The Journal of Physiology.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.