Mark A. Booth

3.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
56 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Mark A. Booth is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Immunology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark A. Booth has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Aquatic Science, 32 papers in Immunology and 31 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Mark A. Booth's work include Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (55 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (32 papers) and Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (31 papers). Mark A. Booth is often cited by papers focused on Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (55 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (32 papers) and Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (31 papers). Mark A. Booth collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Vietnam and Netherlands. Mark A. Booth's co-authors include Geoff L. Allan, Brett Glencross, Igor Pirozzi, Jane Frances, Scott Parkinson, David A.J. Stone, D. Stewart Fielder, Stuart J. Rowland, Paul L. Jones and Bradley J. Tucker and has published in prestigious journals such as Aquaculture, British Journal Of Nutrition and Animal Feed Science and Technology.

In The Last Decade

Mark A. Booth

56 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

A feed is only as good as its ingredients ? a review of i... 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark A. Booth Australia 27 2.1k 1.2k 766 331 324 56 2.4k
David A.J. Stone Australia 28 2.2k 1.0× 1.3k 1.1× 752 1.0× 371 1.1× 237 0.7× 69 2.6k
Ramón Fontanillas Norway 30 1.8k 0.8× 1.3k 1.1× 642 0.8× 342 1.0× 196 0.6× 89 2.3k
Kenji Takii Japan 25 1.8k 0.8× 1.0k 0.9× 768 1.0× 245 0.7× 311 1.0× 118 2.1k
Cláudia Aragão Portugal 30 2.0k 0.9× 1.2k 1.0× 716 0.9× 558 1.7× 207 0.6× 65 2.4k
Barbara Grisdale‐Helland Norway 31 2.5k 1.2× 1.6k 1.4× 926 1.2× 375 1.1× 560 1.7× 48 2.8k
Gro‐Ingunn Hemre Norway 26 1.4k 0.7× 920 0.8× 578 0.8× 290 0.9× 207 0.6× 43 1.8k
Rodrigo O. A. Ozório Portugal 28 1.8k 0.8× 1.3k 1.1× 349 0.5× 346 1.0× 183 0.6× 111 2.2k
Débora Machado Fracalossi Brazil 29 1.7k 0.8× 992 0.8× 508 0.7× 209 0.6× 400 1.2× 103 2.0k
T. Storebakken Norway 29 2.6k 1.2× 1.3k 1.1× 956 1.2× 300 0.9× 259 0.8× 44 3.0k
Richard P. Smullen Australia 21 1.3k 0.6× 999 0.9× 484 0.6× 265 0.8× 145 0.4× 48 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Booth. The network helps show where Mark A. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark A. Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark A. Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark A. Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark A. Booth. Mark A. Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Booth, Mark A., et al.. (2022). Adequate levels of dietary sulphur amino acids impart improved liver and gut health in juvenile yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi). British Journal Of Nutrition. 129(8). 1289–1312. 5 indexed citations
2.
Booth, Mark A. & Igor Pirozzi. (2021). The digestibility of raw materials by barramundi Lates calcarifer: Emphasis on the effect of inclusion rate on the digestibility of soybean meal and soy protein concentrate. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 273. 114800–114800. 8 indexed citations
4.
Booth, Mark A., et al.. (2020). The sulfur amino acid requirements of juvenile Yellowtail Kingfish (Seriola lalandi). Aquaculture. 534. 736234–736234. 15 indexed citations
5.
Booth, Mark A., Igor Pirozzi, Michael Salini, et al.. (2020). Alternative Feed Raw Materials Modulate Intestinal Microbiota and Its Relationship with Digestibility in Yellowtail Kingfish Seriola lalandi. Fishes. 5(2). 14–14. 15 indexed citations
7.
Booth, Mark A., Geoff L. Allan, & Richard P. Smullen. (2013). Digestibility of common feed ingredients by juvenile mulloway Argyrosomus japonicus. Aquaculture. 414-415. 140–148. 24 indexed citations
8.
Booth, Mark A., Geoff L. Allan, & Igor Pirozzi. (2010). Estimation of digestible protein and energy requirements of yellowtail kingfish Seriola lalandi using a factorial approach. Aquaculture. 307(3-4). 247–259. 78 indexed citations
9.
Pirozzi, Igor & Mark A. Booth. (2009). The effect of temperature and body weight on the routine metabolic rate and postprandial metabolic response in mulloway, Argyrosomus japonicus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology. 154(1). 110–118. 29 indexed citations
10.
Pirozzi, Igor, Mark A. Booth, & Geoff L. Allan. (2009). The interactive effects of dietary protein and energy on feed intake, growth and protein utilization of juvenile mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus). Aquaculture Nutrition. 16(1). 61–71. 26 indexed citations
11.
Pirozzi, Igor & Mark A. Booth. (2009). The routine metabolic rate of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus: Sciaenidae) and yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi: Carangidae) acclimated to six different temperatures. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology. 152(4). 586–592. 59 indexed citations
12.
Pirozzi, Igor, Mark A. Booth, & Geoff L. Allan. (2008). Protein and energy utilization and the requirements for maintenance in juvenile mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 36(1). 109–121. 30 indexed citations
13.
Glencross, Brett, Mark A. Booth, & Geoff L. Allan. (2007). A feed is only as good as its ingredients ? a review of ingredient evaluation strategies for aquaculture feeds. Aquaculture Nutrition. 13(1). 17–34. 598 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Tucker, Bradley J., Mark A. Booth, Geoff L. Allan, David J. Booth, & D. Stewart Fielder. (2006). Effects of photoperiod and feeding frequency on performance of newly weaned Australian snapper Pagrus auratus. Aquaculture. 258(1-4). 514–520. 58 indexed citations
16.
Booth, Mark A., Geoff L. Allan, & A. J. Anderson. (2005). Investigation of the nutritional requirements of Australian snapper Pagrus auratus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801): apparent digestibility of protein and energy sources. Aquaculture Research. 36(4). 378–390. 29 indexed citations
17.
18.
Booth, Mark A., et al.. (2004). Effects of dietary astaxanthin source and light manipulation on the skin colour of Australian snapper Pagrus auratus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801). Aquaculture Research. 35(5). 458–464. 71 indexed citations
19.
Allan, Geoff L. & Mark A. Booth. (2003). Aquaculture Diet Development Subprogram: Ingredient Evaluation. 37 indexed citations
20.
Allan, Geoff L., Richard J. Johnson, Mark A. Booth, & David A.J. Stone. (2001). Estimating digestible protein requirements of silver perch, Bidyanus bidyanus Mitchell. Aquaculture Research. 32(5). 337–347. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026