Mark A. Arick
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Plant and Fungal Interactions Research
- Horticulture top 10%
Papers in
-
- Plant and Fungal Interactions Research 12
-
- Research in Cotton Cultivation 18
- Plant Virus Research Studies 17
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 4
- Co-authors
- Daniel G. PetersonCorrinne E. GroverJonathan F. WendelMark L. LawrenceChuan-Yu HsuAdam ThrashJoshua A. UdallSusan M. Bridges
- Journals
- G3 Genes Genomes Genetics (9 papers)Scientific Reports (4 papers)Frontiers in Plant Science (4 papers)Genome Biology and Evolution (4 papers)Poultry Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaSpain
In The Last Decade
Mark A. Arick
51 papers receiving 783 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Endocrinology 91
- Horticulture 13
- Plant Science 377
- Molecular Biology 334
- Biotechnology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Arick
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Arick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Arick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Arick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Arick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Arick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Arick. The network helps show where Mark A. Arick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Arick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 68 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 49 |
About Mark A. Arick
Mark A. Arick is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Plant Science, Food Science, Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research in Cotton Cultivation (18 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (17 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (12 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (8 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (8 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers) and Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (91 citations), Horticulture (13 citations), Plant Science (377 citations), Molecular Biology (334 citations) and Biotechnology (40 citations). Mark A. Arick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Daniel G. Peterson, Corrinne E. Grover, Jonathan F. Wendel, Mark L. Lawrence, Chuan-Yu Hsu, Adam Thrash, Joshua A. Udall, Susan M. Bridges, Justin L. Conover and Debarati Paul. Their work appears in journals such as G3 Genes Genomes Genetics, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Plant Science, Genome Biology and Evolution and Poultry Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.