Marjorie Shaw Phillips

18 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

Marjorie Shaw Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Clinical Psychology 65
  • Pharmacology 52
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 50
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 47
Replace M.H.C.T. van Beek with:
M.H.C.T. van Beek Netherlands
Dale A. D’Mello United States
Biserka Sedić Croatia
Paul Quinlan United States
Noel H. Ballentine United States
Helen L. Leathard United Kingdom
Cheryl Phillips United Kingdom
Jennifer Romesser United States
Gillian L. Sowden United States
D. Stephenson United Kingdom
Marjorie Shaw Phillips relative to M.H.C.T. van Beek Netherlands M.H.C.T. van Beek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
M.H.C.T. van Beek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marjorie Shaw Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marjorie Shaw Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marjorie Shaw Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marjorie Shaw Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marjorie Shaw Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marjorie Shaw Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marjorie Shaw Phillips. The network helps show where Marjorie Shaw Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marjorie Shaw Phillips

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marjorie Shaw Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marjorie Shaw Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marjorie Shaw Phillips. Marjorie Shaw Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 104
3 3
4 43
5 15
6 6
7 4
8 4
9 15
10 11
11
Handbook of Drug Administration via Enteral Feeding Tubes.
1
12 5
13 12
14 8
15 6
16 26
17 7
18 3

About Marjorie Shaw Phillips

Marjorie Shaw Phillips is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Emergency Medical Services and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (6 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (5 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (30 citations). Marjorie Shaw Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Christopher T. Campbell, Peter B. Rosenquist, Laryssa McCloud, W. Vaughn McCall, Jill C. Newman, Ruth M. Benca, Andrew D. Krystal, Doug Case, Meredith E. Rumble and Steven T. Szabo. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine and American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026