Marion Allison

558 total citations
22 papers, 375 citations indexed

About

Marion Allison is a scholar working on Surgery, Rheumatology and Urology. According to data from OpenAlex, Marion Allison has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 375 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Surgery, 20 papers in Rheumatology and 6 papers in Urology. Recurrent topics in Marion Allison's work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (20 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (18 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (6 papers). Marion Allison is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic floor disorders treatments (20 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (18 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (6 papers). Marion Allison collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Norway. Marion Allison's co-authors include Christopher L. Chan, Norman S. Williams, Alexander Hotouras, Jamie Murphy, Charles H. Knowles, Mohamed A. Thaha, Claire Chan, James O. Lindsay, Mayoni L. Gooneratne and Daniel Kelly and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastroenterology, Annals of Surgery and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

Marion Allison

22 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marion Allison United Kingdom 11 337 321 96 31 28 22 375
Jakob Duelund‐Jakobsen Denmark 11 216 0.6× 225 0.7× 99 1.0× 28 0.9× 54 1.9× 19 281
L. Bartlett Australia 10 325 1.0× 274 0.9× 9 0.1× 82 2.6× 43 1.5× 16 384
B. Govaert Netherlands 11 271 0.8× 250 0.8× 103 1.1× 48 1.5× 84 3.0× 14 353
Michel Queralto France 10 325 1.0× 272 0.8× 39 0.4× 37 1.2× 91 3.3× 16 374
V. Piloni Italy 11 391 1.2× 385 1.2× 55 0.6× 68 2.2× 55 2.0× 21 473
Paul F. Vollebregt United Kingdom 12 293 0.9× 247 0.8× 22 0.2× 30 1.0× 159 5.7× 32 395
Shannon L. Wallace United States 8 139 0.4× 165 0.5× 41 0.4× 9 0.3× 4 0.1× 36 265
M. Haddad France 8 125 0.4× 128 0.4× 168 1.8× 9 0.3× 32 1.1× 21 268
Josep M. Font i Rius Spain 4 241 0.7× 214 0.7× 87 0.9× 53 1.7× 37 1.3× 12 293
Ö. Uludağ Netherlands 10 486 1.4× 511 1.6× 172 1.8× 41 1.3× 63 2.3× 13 544

Countries citing papers authored by Marion Allison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marion Allison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marion Allison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marion Allison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marion Allison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marion Allison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marion Allison. The network helps show where Marion Allison may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marion Allison

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marion Allison. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marion Allison based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marion Allison. Marion Allison is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hotouras, Alexander, Jamie Murphy, Marion Allison, et al.. (2014). Prospective clinical audit of two neuromodulatory treatments for fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). Surgery Today. 44(11). 2124–2130. 22 indexed citations
2.
Hotouras, Alexander, Yolanda Ribas, Marion Allison, & Christopher L. Chan. (2014). Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in the Era of Neuromodulation. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 57(9). 1143–1144. 1 indexed citations
3.
Murphy, Jamie, et al.. (2014). Electrically Stimulated Gracilis Neosphincter for End-stage Fecal Incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 57(2). 215–222. 5 indexed citations
4.
Thin, N, Stephanie Taylor, Stephen Bremner, et al.. (2014). 882 Randomised Mixed Methods Trial of Sacral and Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence. Gastroenterology. 146(5). S–154. 2 indexed citations
5.
Allison, Marion, et al.. (2013). Surgery in young adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A narrative account. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 50(11). 1566–1575. 28 indexed citations
6.
Hotouras, Alexander, Jamie Murphy, N Thin, et al.. (2013). Outcome of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence in Patients Refractory to Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 56(7). 915–920. 14 indexed citations
7.
Hotouras, Alexander, Jamie Murphy, Una Walsh, et al.. (2013). Outcome of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) for Fecal Incontinence. Annals of Surgery. 259(5). 939–943. 38 indexed citations
8.
Hotouras, Alexander, Jamie Murphy, Marion Allison, et al.. (2013). Symptom distribution and anorectal physiology results in male patients with rectal intussusception and prolapse. Journal of Surgical Research. 188(1). 298–302. 8 indexed citations
9.
Hotouras, Alexander, et al.. (2013). Assessment of Female Patients With Rectal Intussusception and Prolapse. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 56(6). 780–785. 17 indexed citations
10.
Hotouras, Alexander, et al.. (2012). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in females with faecal incontinence: the impact of sphincter morphology and rectal sensation on the clinical outcome. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 27(7). 927–930. 30 indexed citations
11.
Hotouras, Alexander, et al.. (2012). Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 55(6). 711–713. 7 indexed citations
12.
Allison, Marion. (2011). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for patients with faecal incontinence. Nursing Standard. 25(24). 44–48. 12 indexed citations
13.
Murphy, Jamie, et al.. (2011). Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 54(10). 1271–1278. 46 indexed citations
14.
Hotouras, Alexander, et al.. (2011). Short‐term outcome following percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a single‐centre prospective study. Colorectal Disease. 14(9). 1101–1105. 40 indexed citations
15.
Allison, Marion. (2011). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for patients with faecal incontinence. Nursing Standard. 25(24). 44–48. 6 indexed citations
16.
Allison, Marion. (2010). Conservative management of faecal incontinence in adults. Nursing Standard. 24(26). 49–56. 5 indexed citations
17.
Allison, Marion, et al.. (2010). Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Urge Fecal Incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 53(4). 432–437. 62 indexed citations
18.
Allison, Marion. (2010). Conservative management of faecal incontinence in adults. Nursing Standard. 24(26). 49–56. 5 indexed citations
19.
Allison, Marion, et al.. (2005). The Colorectal Development Unit: impact on functional outcome for the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter. Colorectal Disease. 8(1). 46–55. 4 indexed citations
20.
Williams, N S, L Dvorkin, Pasquale Giordano, et al.. (2005). EXternal Pelvic REctal SuSpension (Express procedure) for rectal intussusception, with and without rectocele repair. British journal of surgery. 92(5). 598–604. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026