Mario Haim

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
47 papers, 977 citations indexed

About

Mario Haim is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Mario Haim has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 977 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 22 papers in Communication and 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Mario Haim's work include Social Media and Politics (19 papers), Media Studies and Communication (14 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (9 papers). Mario Haim is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (19 papers), Media Studies and Communication (14 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (9 papers). Mario Haim collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Norway and United States. Mario Haim's co-authors include Andreas Graefe, Hans‐Bernd Brosius, Florian Arendt, Sebastian Scherr, Marc Jungblut, Anna Sophie Kümpel, Julian Unkel, Elsa Bach, Johannes Breuer and Sebastian Stier and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Age and Ageing.

In The Last Decade

Mario Haim

44 papers receiving 919 citations

Hit Papers

Burst of the Filter Bubble? 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mario Haim Germany 15 564 439 197 97 77 47 977
Judith Möller Netherlands 16 733 1.3× 662 1.5× 237 1.2× 117 1.2× 127 1.6× 38 1.4k
Mykola Makhortykh Switzerland 18 472 0.8× 339 0.8× 207 1.1× 82 0.8× 137 1.8× 89 910
Ronald E. Robertson United States 16 775 1.4× 423 1.0× 323 1.6× 133 1.4× 184 2.4× 31 1.2k
Dag Elgesem Norway 14 415 0.7× 234 0.5× 116 0.6× 75 0.8× 67 0.9× 29 723
Judith Moeller Netherlands 16 508 0.9× 474 1.1× 120 0.6× 118 1.2× 61 0.8× 28 847
María D. Molina United States 15 645 1.1× 242 0.6× 311 1.6× 128 1.3× 127 1.6× 23 979
Alexander Volfovsky United States 10 770 1.4× 646 1.5× 228 1.2× 44 0.5× 59 0.8× 30 1.2k
Aleksandra Urman Switzerland 14 439 0.8× 345 0.8× 179 0.9× 41 0.4× 65 0.8× 50 697
Jennette Lovejoy United States 8 945 1.7× 447 1.0× 142 0.7× 22 0.2× 124 1.6× 12 1.3k
Farida Vis United Kingdom 10 465 0.8× 458 1.0× 138 0.7× 16 0.2× 64 0.8× 14 868

Countries citing papers authored by Mario Haim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mario Haim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mario Haim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mario Haim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mario Haim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mario Haim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mario Haim. The network helps show where Mario Haim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mario Haim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mario Haim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mario Haim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mario Haim. Mario Haim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Haim, Mario, et al.. (2025). Climate Communication in the Hybrid Media System: Media and Stakeholder Logics on Social Media. Media and Communication. 13. 2 indexed citations
2.
Schmalz, Xenia, et al.. (2025). Let’s talk about language—and its role for replicability. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 12(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Waldherr, Annie, Matthew S. Weber, Shangyuan Wu, et al.. (2024). Between Innovation and Standardization: Best Practices and Inclusive Guidelines in Computational Communication Science. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 102(1). 13–36. 2 indexed citations
4.
Breuer, Johannes & Mario Haim. (2024). Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research. Media and Communication. 12. 3 indexed citations
5.
Hase, Valerie, Jef Ausloos, Laura Boeschoten, et al.. (2024). Fulfilling data access obligations: How could (and should) platforms facilitate data donation studies?. Internet Policy Review. 13(3). 2 indexed citations
6.
Hase, Valerie & Mario Haim. (2024). Can We Get Rid of Bias? Mitigating Systematic Error in Data Donation Studies through Survey Design Strategies. Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen). 6(2). 1–1. 3 indexed citations
7.
Haim, Mario, Dominik J. Leiner, & Valerie Hase. (2023). Integrating Data Donations in Online Surveys. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft. 71(1-2). 130–137. 3 indexed citations
8.
Haim, Mario, Valerie Hase, Marko Bachl, et al.. (2023). Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis. Studies in Communication and Media. 12(4). I–III. 1 indexed citations
9.
Haim, Mario. (2023). Computational Communication Science. 4 indexed citations
10.
Haim, Mario & Cornelius Puschmann. (2023). Opening up Data, Tools, and Practices: Collaborating with the Future. Digital Journalism. 11(2). 247–254. 3 indexed citations
11.
Haim, Mario & Christoph Neuberger. (2022). The paradox of knowing more and less: Audience metrics and the erosion of epistemic standards on the internet. Studies in Communication and Media. 11(4). 566–589. 1 indexed citations
12.
Breuer, Johannes, Zoltán Kmetty, Mario Haim, & Sebastian Stier. (2022). User-centric approaches for collecting Facebook data in the ‘post-API age’: experiences from two studies and recommendations for future research. Information Communication & Society. 26(14). 2649–2668. 28 indexed citations
13.
Haim, Mario, Sebastian Scherr, & Florian Arendt. (2021). How search engines may help reduce drug-related suicides. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 226. 108874–108874. 4 indexed citations
14.
Haim, Mario, et al.. (2021). Stereotypes and sexism? Effects of gender, topic, and user comments on journalists’ credibility. Journalism. 24(7). 1442–1461. 6 indexed citations
15.
Arendt, Florian, Mario Haim, & Sebastian Scherr. (2020). Investigating Google's suicide-prevention efforts in celebrity suicides using agent-based testing: A cross-national study in four European countries. Social Science & Medicine. 262. 112692–112692. 18 indexed citations
16.
Haim, Mario & Rodrigo Zamith. (2019). Open-Source Trading Zones and Boundary Objects: Examining GitHub as a Space for Collaborating on “News”. Media and Communication. 7(4). 80–91. 12 indexed citations
17.
Haim, Mario, et al.. (2019). Computational observation. Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen). 1(1). 79–102. 20 indexed citations
18.
Haim, Mario & Andreas Graefe. (2017). Automated News. Digital Journalism. 5(8). 1044–1059. 53 indexed citations
19.
Graefe, Andreas, et al.. (2016). Readers’ perception of computer-generated news: Credibility, expertise, and readability. Journalism. 19(5). 595–610. 181 indexed citations
20.
Haim, Mario, Florian Arendt, & Sebastian Scherr. (2016). Abyss or Shelter? On the Relevance of Web Search Engines’ Search Results When People Google for Suicide. Health Communication. 32(2). 253–258. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026