Marine Groslambert
About
In The Last Decade
Marine Groslambert
5 papers receiving 428 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Molecular Biology 336
- Immunology 160
- Epidemiology 72
- Surgery 53
- Nephrology 44
Countries citing papers authored by Marine Groslambert
This map shows the geographic impact of Marine Groslambert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marine Groslambert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marine Groslambert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marine Groslambert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marine Groslambert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marine Groslambert. The network helps show where Marine Groslambert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marine Groslambert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marine Groslambert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marine Groslambert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marine Groslambert. Marine Groslambert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 81 | |
| 2 | 209 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 67 | |
| 5 | 60 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.