Marie‐Chantal Bourdel
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Marie‐Odile KrebsJean‐Pierre OliéMarie‐France PoirierDavid GourionBruno MilletHenri LôoCéline GoldbergerXavier Laqueille
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Marie‐Chantal Bourdel
33 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Psychiatry and Mental health 556
- Cognitive Neuroscience 314
- Clinical Psychology 310
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 228
- Molecular Biology 132
Countries citing papers authored by Marie‐Chantal Bourdel
This map shows the geographic impact of Marie‐Chantal Bourdel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marie‐Chantal Bourdel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marie‐Chantal Bourdel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marie‐Chantal Bourdel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marie‐Chantal Bourdel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marie‐Chantal Bourdel. The network helps show where Marie‐Chantal Bourdel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marie‐Chantal Bourdel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marie‐Chantal Bourdel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marie‐Chantal Bourdel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marie‐Chantal Bourdel. Marie‐Chantal Bourdel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 74 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 54 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 123 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 122 | |
| 18 | 91 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Marie‐Chantal Bourdel
Marie‐Chantal Bourdel is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Anatomy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (556 citations), Biological Psychiatry (51 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (314 citations). Marie‐Chantal Bourdel has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marie‐Odile Krebs, Jean‐Pierre Olié, Marie‐France Poirier, David Gourion, Bruno Millet, Henri Lôo, Céline Goldberger, Xavier Laqueille, Alain Dervaux and D. Attar-Lèvy. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.