Marie Scott

850 citations
6 papers · 471 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Marie Scott

6 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

Marie Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Materials Chemistry 301
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 201
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 260
  • Biomedical Engineering 182
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 63
Replace Simone Schuler with:
Simone Schuler Austria
Mandeep Khatoniar United States
Sergei Kuehn Germany
Jiayue Tong United States
E. D. Cherotchenko Russia
Thonimar V. Alencar Brazil
B. Habert France
Yi-Cong Yu China
Runkun Chen China
Sheng Gan China
Marie Scott relative to Simone Schuler Austria Simone Schuler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Simone Schuler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marie Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marie Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marie Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marie Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marie Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marie Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marie Scott. The network helps show where Marie Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marie Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marie Scott Line = papers co-authored together Marie Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2017188
2 2016170
3 201679
4 201519
5 198412
6
Diccionario Matsigenka-Castellano
20173

About Marie Scott

Marie Scott is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy, having authored 6 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include 2D Materials and Applications (4 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (2 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (2 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (1 paper), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (1 paper), Strong Light-Matter Interactions (1 paper) and Graphene research and applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (301 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (201 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (260 citations), Biomedical Engineering (182 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (63 citations). Marie Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jiaqiang Yan, David Mandrus, Xiaodong Xu, Zhe Fei, Fengrui Hu, Y. Luan, John R. Schaibley, Akshay Singh, Gunnar Berghäuser and Xiaoqin Li. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Nature Photonics, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact