Margarida Azevedo
About
In The Last Decade
Margarida Azevedo
5 papers receiving 63 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Genetics 29
- Molecular Biology 21
- Sociology and Political Science 11
- Law 10
- Pharmacology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Margarida Azevedo
This map shows the geographic impact of Margarida Azevedo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margarida Azevedo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margarida Azevedo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margarida Azevedo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margarida Azevedo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margarida Azevedo. The network helps show where Margarida Azevedo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margarida Azevedo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margarida Azevedo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margarida Azevedo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margarida Azevedo. Margarida Azevedo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Manual de direito do trabalho | 18 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.