Margaret Schot

2.0k total citations
24 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Margaret Schot is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret Schot has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Oncology, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Margaret Schot's work include Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (15 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers) and Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (5 papers). Margaret Schot is often cited by papers focused on Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (15 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers) and Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (5 papers). Margaret Schot collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Margaret Schot's co-authors include Jos H. Beijnen, Jan H.M. Schellens, W.W. ten Bokkel Huinink, Hilde Rosing, C.M.F. Kruijtzer, Roxanne C. Jewell, Elaine Paul, Franciska J. Koopman, Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters and Marieke E. Straver and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Margaret Schot

24 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Margaret Schot
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Oncology 790
  • Molecular Biology 391
  • Cancer Research 378
  • Biomaterials 275
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 270
Replace Lorena González with:
Lorena González Argentina
Fuli Wang China
Hiroshi Kodaira Japan
Renata Jaskula‐Sztul United States
Patricia García‐López Mexico
Daniel A. Norris United States
Feng Zhou China
Claudia Lanvers‐Kaminsky Germany
Jason H. Gill United Kingdom
Lorena González Argentina View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Margaret Schot
Margaret Schot · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Margaret Schot
Margaret Schot · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Schot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Schot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Schot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Schot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Schot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Schot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Schot. The network helps show where Margaret Schot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Schot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Schot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Schot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Schot. Margaret Schot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 18
3 298
4 9
5 11
6 59
7 22
8 26
9 32
10 37
11
Randomized phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of weekly versus twice-weekly dose-intensive cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
7
12 86
13 94
14 13
15 192
16 55
17 6
18 11
19 19
20 4

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026