Margaret Piper
- Oncology top 5%
- Hematology top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Evelyn P WhitlockElizabeth O’ConnorElizabeth M. WebberJames E. HaddowJerome SeidenfeldLeslie A PerdueJennifer S LinNed Calonge
- Topics
- Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (14 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers)BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers)
- Cited by
- HematologyBiochemistryOncology
- Journals
- JAMABloodAnnals of Internal Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Margaret Piper
51 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Oncology 969
- Hematology 798
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 430
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 351
- Genetics 324
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Piper
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Piper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Piper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Piper. The network helps show where Margaret Piper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Piper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Piper. Margaret Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force | 2 |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Groupbreakdown → | 484 |
| 8 | 60 | |
| 9 | 392 | |
| 10 | 165 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 67 | |
| 15 | 169 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | Australia's Refugee Policy | 2 |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Margaret Piper
Margaret Piper is a scholar working on Hematology, Family Practice and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (14 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (798 citations), Biochemistry (220 citations) and Oncology (969 citations). Margaret Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Evelyn P Whitlock, Elizabeth O’Connor, Elizabeth M. Webber, James E. Haddow, Jerome Seidenfeld, Leslie A Perdue, Jennifer S Lin, Ned Calonge, Glenn E. Palomaki and Charles L. Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Blood and Annals of Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.