Margaret G. Hopper

27 papers receiving 712 citations

Peers

Margaret G. Hopper
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Geophysics 646
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 432
  • Artificial Intelligence 186
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 56
  • Sociology and Political Science 35
Replace G. M. Atkinson with:
G. M. Atkinson Canada
Craig W. Scrivner United States
E. Durukal Türkiye
Valentino Lauciani Italy
Philipp Kästli Switzerland
Mustafa Erdik Türkiye
Kristin D. Marano United States
Matt Gerstenberger New Zealand
Erin A. Wirth United States
Allison M. Shumway United States
Margaret G. Hopper relative to G. M. Atkinson Canada G. M. Atkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
G. M. Atkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret G. Hopper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret G. Hopper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret G. Hopper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret G. Hopper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret G. Hopper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret G. Hopper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret G. Hopper. The network helps show where Margaret G. Hopper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret G. Hopper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret G. Hopper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret G. Hopper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret G. Hopper. Margaret G. Hopper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 163
3
Five Years of Citizen Science: Macroseismic Data Collection with the USGS Community Internet Intensity Maps (``Did You Feel It?'')
1
4 1
5 3
6 18
7 128
8
USGS NATIONAL SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS: UNIFORM HAZARD SPECTRA, DE-AGGREGATION, AND UNCERTAINTY
9
9 21
10 24
11 12
12
New USGS Seismic Hazard Maps for the United States
4
13 7
14 8
15 3
16 8
17 12
18 15
19 5
20 5

About Margaret G. Hopper

Margaret G. Hopper is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Ecological Modeling, having authored 27 papers that have together received 819 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seismology and Earthquake Studies (20 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (19 papers) and Seismic Waves and Analysis (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (646 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (432 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (186 citations). Margaret G. Hopper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Arthur D. Frankel, E. V. Leyendecker, David M. Perkins, Stanley L. Hanson, Theodore P. Barnhard, Vincent Quitoriano, C. Bruce Worden, W. B. James, Charles S. Mueller and S.T. Algermissen. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Earthquake Spectra and Seismological Research Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026