Margaret E. Hogan

23 papers receiving 739 citations

Peers

Margaret E. Hogan
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Urology 140
  • Cell Biology 177
  • Dermatology 80
  • Insect Science 93
  • Molecular Biology 350
Replace Anne Kilkenny with:
Anne Kilkenny United States
J. Schweizer Germany
Neha Sharma India
Heggert Rebel Netherlands
Lori Alas United States
Tamara Potikha Israel
Birgit Samans Germany
Kathryn E. King United States
Deyun Chen China
York Kamenisch Germany
Margaret E. Hogan relative to Anne Kilkenny United States Anne Kilkenny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Anne Kilkenny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret E. Hogan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret E. Hogan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret E. Hogan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret E. Hogan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret E. Hogan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret E. Hogan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret E. Hogan. The network helps show where Margaret E. Hogan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Margaret E. Hogan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Margaret E. Hogan Line = papers co-authored together Margaret E. Hogan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Genetically null mice reveal a central role for epidermal growth factor receptor in the differentiation of the hair follicle and normal hair development.
1997171
2 198399
3 198872
4 198769
5 198857
6 199748
7
Harlequin ichthyosis (ichq): a juvenile lethal mouse mutation with ichthyosiform dermatitis.
199738
8 198534
9 198632
10 198832
11 199626
12 199518
13 198518
14 198817
15 199513
16 19918
17 19866
18 19956
19 19874
20 19943

About Margaret E. Hogan

Margaret E. Hogan is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Urology, Cell Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Genetics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hair Growth and Disorders (7 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (3 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (2 papers) and Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (140 citations), Cell Biology (177 citations), Dermatology (80 citations), Insect Science (93 citations) and Molecular Biology (350 citations). Margaret E. Hogan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include John P. Sundberg, M. Slaytor, J. Done, Melvin Schindler, David W. Threadgill, Nathan Alexander, A. Dlugosz, S H Yuspa, R. Czolij and Terry Magnuson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Journal of Insect Physiology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Journal of Dermatology and Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact