Margaret Childs
- Hepatology top 0.5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rudolf MaibachPiotr CzaudernaGiorgio PerilongoDaniël C. AronsonDerek RoebuckPenelope BrockJ. PlaschkesLaurence Brugières
- Topics
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (13 papers)Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers)Testicular diseases and treatments (5 papers)
- Cited by
- HepatologyOncologyCancer Research
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Margaret Childs
32 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Hepatology 954
- Oncology 603
- Surgery 566
- Molecular Biology 443
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 321
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Childs
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Childs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Childs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Childs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Childs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Childs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Childs. The network helps show where Margaret Childs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Childs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Childs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Childs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Childs. Margaret Childs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 217 | |
| 6 | 73 | |
| 7 | 115 | |
| 8 | 75 | |
| 9 | 53 | |
| 10 | DOSE DENSE CISPLATIN IMPROVES SURVIVAL IN CHILDREN PRESENTING WITH METASTATIC HEPATOBLASTOMA : LESSONS FROM SIOPEL 1 TO 4 | 1 |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 205 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 223 | |
| 15 | 97 | |
| 16 | 197 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 36 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Margaret Childs
Margaret Childs is a scholar working on Hepatology, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (13 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers) and Testicular diseases and treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (954 citations), Oncology (603 citations) and Cancer Research (280 citations). Margaret Childs has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Rudolf Maibach, Piotr Czauderna, Giorgio Perilongo, Daniël C. Aronson, Derek Roebuck, Penelope Brock, J. Plaschkes, Laurence Brugières, Arthur Zimmermann and József Zsíros. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Hepatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.