Margaret Atherton

62 total papers · 878 total citations
22 papers, 280 citations indexed

About

Margaret Atherton is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret Atherton has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 280 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 6 papers in Philosophy and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Margaret Atherton's work include Historical Philosophy and Science (9 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers). Margaret Atherton is often cited by papers focused on Historical Philosophy and Science (9 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers). Margaret Atherton collaborates with scholars based in United States. Margaret Atherton's co-authors include Heiko Hecht, R. S. Peters, R. F. Dearden, P. H. Hirst, Robert J. Schwartz and Robert S. Schwartz and has published in prestigious journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

In The Last Decade

Margaret Atherton

15 papers receiving 214 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Margaret Atherton	67	59	49	44	37	22	280
Eugene E. Selk	36 0.5×	27 0.5×	36 0.7×	49 1.1×	17 0.5×	11	209
Paul J. Olscamp	98 1.5×	51 0.9×	108 2.2×	21 0.5×	39 1.1×	18	294
Vincent M. Colapietro	127 1.9×	20 0.3×	28 0.6×	26 0.6×	42 1.1×	27	311
Tom Sparrow	78 1.2×	81 1.4×	22 0.4×	16 0.4×	46 1.2×	18	277
Elizabeth M. Wilkinson	74 1.1×	23 0.4×	10 0.2×	32 0.7×	34 0.9×	20	310
Edward Larrissy	53 0.8×	22 0.4×	14 0.3×	19 0.4×	48 1.3×	23	296
Jerome Stolnitz	103 1.5×	83 1.4×	34 0.7×	12 0.3×	69 1.9×	34	293
Cameron Shelley	63 0.9×	17 0.3×	25 0.5×	17 0.4×	68 1.8×	29	271
Stephen C. Pepper	38 0.6×	19 0.3×	11 0.2×	17 0.4×	46 1.2×	34	208
Elisabeth Ströker	127 1.9×	23 0.4×	56 1.1×	16 0.4×	135 3.6×	28	277

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Atherton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Atherton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Atherton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Atherton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Atherton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Atherton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Atherton. The network helps show where Margaret Atherton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Atherton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Atherton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Atherton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Atherton. Margaret Atherton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact