Marcus Galea
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Oncology top 10%
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 5
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 4
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 1
- Co-authors
- Ian O. Ellis (2 shared papers)Roger W. Blamey (2 shared papers)David Poller (1 shared paper)C.W. Elston (1 shared paper)Zoë Winters (1 shared paper)Helen Thomson (1 shared paper)Judith Mills (1 shared paper)Alexander M. Reece-Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Breast (1 paper)European Journal of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)Journal of Pediatric Surgery (1 paper)Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (1 paper)Surgery (Oxford) (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Marcus Galea
7 papers receiving 842 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Cancer Research 517
- Oncology 452
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 213
- Genetics 107
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 85
Countries citing papers authored by Marcus Galea
This map shows the geographic impact of Marcus Galea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcus Galea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcus Galea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marcus Galea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcus Galea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcus Galea. The network helps show where Marcus Galea may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Marcus Galea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 1992 | 836 |
| 2 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 5 | SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF OCCULT BLOOD TESTING IN SYMPTOMATIC SINGLE DUCT NIPPLE DISCHARGE TO DETECT DUCTAL CARCINOMA | 2013 | 1 |
| 6 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 1 |
About Marcus Galea
Marcus Galea is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Dermatology, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 855 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (1 paper), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (1 paper), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (1 paper) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (517 citations), Oncology (452 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (213 citations), Genetics (107 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (85 citations). Marcus Galea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, Roger W. Blamey, David Poller, C.W. Elston, Zoë Winters, Helen Thomson, Judith Mills, Alexander M. Reece-Smith, Eva Weiler-Mithoff and Joanne Haviland. Their work appears in journals such as The Breast, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment and Surgery (Oxford).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.