Marcos M. Pires
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Oncology
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Jean ChmielewskiSean E. PidgeonDavid E. PrzybylaChristine A. HrycynaDaniel B. KearnsCharles M. Rubert PérezDmitri VezenovDaniel W. Kulp
- Topics
- Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (14 papers)Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (13 papers)Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (12 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaBrazil
In The Last Decade
Marcos M. Pires
64 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Molecular Biology 833
- Biomaterials 350
- Organic Chemistry 302
- Oncology 199
- Materials Chemistry 196
Countries citing papers authored by Marcos M. Pires
This map shows the geographic impact of Marcos M. Pires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcos M. Pires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcos M. Pires more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marcos M. Pires
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcos M. Pires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcos M. Pires. The network helps show where Marcos M. Pires may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marcos M. Pires
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marcos M. Pires. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marcos M. Pires based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marcos M. Pires. Marcos M. Pires is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 112 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 89 |
About Marcos M. Pires
Marcos M. Pires is a scholar working on Microbiology, Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (14 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (13 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (186 citations), Biomaterials (350 citations) and Molecular Medicine (115 citations). Marcos M. Pires has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Jean Chmielewski, Sean E. Pidgeon, David E. Przybyla, Christine A. Hrycyna, Daniel B. Kearns, Charles M. Rubert Pérez, Dmitri Vezenov, Daniel W. Kulp, Jeeyeon Lee and Hyunil Jo. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.