Marco Roelcke
- Soil Science top 1%
- Environmental Chemistry top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering top 5%
- Topics
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (25 papers)Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (15 papers)Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsSoil Biology and Biochemistry
- Partner nations
- ChinaGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Marco Roelcke
38 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Soil Science 853
- Environmental Chemistry 521
- Plant Science 500
- Agronomy and Crop Science 228
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 217
Countries citing papers authored by Marco Roelcke
This map shows the geographic impact of Marco Roelcke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco Roelcke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco Roelcke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marco Roelcke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco Roelcke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco Roelcke. The network helps show where Marco Roelcke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marco Roelcke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marco Roelcke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marco Roelcke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marco Roelcke. Marco Roelcke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 105 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 116 | |
| 14 | 87 | |
| 15 | Recent Trends and Recommendations for Nitrogen Fertilization in Intensive Agriculture in Eastern China | 43 |
| 16 | 257 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | Ecological and agro-economical aspects of nitrogen pollution in an intensive cropping system in Eastern China | 2 |
About Marco Roelcke
Marco Roelcke is a scholar working on Soil Science, Environmental Chemistry and Process Chemistry and Technology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (25 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (15 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (853 citations), Environmental Chemistry (521 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (97 citations). Marco Roelcke has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fusuo Zhang, Xuejun Liu, J. Richter, Xiaotang Ju, Rolf Nieder, Yong Han, Ting Lan, Zucong Cai, Wenqi Ma and Andreas Pacholski. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Soil Biology and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.