Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Current and future CO 2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia
2010478 citationsA. Hooijer, Susan Page et al.Biogeosciencesprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Marcel Silvius
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Marcel Silvius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcel Silvius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcel Silvius more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcel Silvius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcel Silvius. The network helps show where Marcel Silvius may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marcel Silvius
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marcel Silvius.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marcel Silvius based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marcel Silvius. Marcel Silvius is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Silvius, Marcel, et al.. (2011). White-winged. Wood Duck, a new site for Jambi Province. 4. 151–152.
7.
Hooijer, A., Susan Page, Josep G. Canadell, et al.. (2010). Current and future CO 2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences. 7(5). 1505–1514.478 indexed citations breakdown →
Diemont, W.H., et al.. (2004). The global peatland initiative as a partnership. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 533–537.1 indexed citations
12.
Verhagen, A., W.H. Diemont, J.O. Rieley, et al.. (2004). Financial mechanisms for wise use of peatlands in Borneo. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 762–767.2 indexed citations
13.
Silvius, Marcel, W.H. Diemont, Hans Jansen, et al.. (2002). Financial mechanisms for poverty-environment issues; the bio-rights system. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
14.
Silvius, Marcel, W.H. Diemont, & J.O. Rieley. (2002). Global peatland initiative. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 251–255.
15.
Silvius, Marcel, et al.. (2000). Wetlands: Lifeline for people at the edge. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Part B Hydrology Oceans and Atmosphere. 25(7-8). 645–652.83 indexed citations
16.
Silvius, Marcel, et al.. (1989). The status of storks, ibises and spoonbills in Indonesia. 4. 119–133.6 indexed citations
17.
Silvius, Marcel. (1988). On the importance of Sumatra’s East Coast for waterbirds, with notes on the Asian Dowitcher Limnodromus semipa1matus. 3. 117–137.3 indexed citations
18.
Silvius, Marcel, et al.. (1986). The birds of Berbak Game Reserve, Jambi Province, Sumatra. 2(4). 76–84.3 indexed citations
19.
Silvius, Marcel, et al.. (1984). Soils, vegetation, fauna and nature conservation of the Berbak Game Reserve, Sumatra, Indonesia. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.