Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Absolute calibration of 10Be AMS standards
20071.3k citationsK. Nishiizumi, Marc W. Caffee et al.profile →
Geological calibration of spallation production rates in the CRONUS-Earth project
2015544 citationsMarc W. Caffee, Brent M. Goehring et al.Quaternary Geochronologyprofile →
Deglaciation of Fennoscandia
2015468 citationsArjen P. Stroeven, Clas Hättestrand et al.Quaternary Science Reviewsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Marc W. Caffee
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Marc W. Caffee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marc W. Caffee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marc W. Caffee more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marc W. Caffee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marc W. Caffee. The network helps show where Marc W. Caffee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marc W. Caffee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marc W. Caffee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marc W. Caffee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marc W. Caffee. Marc W. Caffee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nishiizumi, K., Marc W. Caffee, & A. J. Irving. (2012). Exposure History of Tissint: Evidence for 1.1 Million Year Launch Pairing with Other Depleted Olivine-Phyric Shergottites. M&PSA. 75. 5349.7 indexed citations
13.
Nishiizumi, K., et al.. (2009). Exposure History of Lunar Meteorite Northwest Africa 5000. LPI. 1476.3 indexed citations
14.
Nishiizumi, K., et al.. (2008). Large meteoritic impact on Antarctic ice sheet 434 Kyr ago-micrometeorites found in the dome fuji ice core. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 43. 5291.1 indexed citations
15.
Nishiizumi, K., Marc W. Caffee, & Susan Taylor. (2007). Cosmogenic Radionuclides in Glass Spherules from the South Pole Water Well in Antarctica. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 42. 5188.1 indexed citations
16.
Nishiizumi, K. & Marc W. Caffee. (2001). Exposure Histories of Lunar Meteorites Dhofar 025, 026, and Northwest Africa 482. M&PSA. 36.6 indexed citations
17.
Nishiizumi, K., Marc W. Caffee, Hiroyuki Nagai, & M. Imamura. (1996). Multiple Breakup of ALH 85085-like and CR Group Chondrites. Meteoritics and Planetary Science Supplement. 31.1 indexed citations
18.
Nishiizumi, K., J. R. Arnold, Marc W. Caffee, et al.. (1993). Exposure ages of carbonaceous chondrites, 1. 1085.4 indexed citations
19.
Swindle, T. D., Marc W. Caffee, & C. M. Hohenberg. (1986). I-Xe Studies of Individual Chondrules. Meteoritics and Planetary Science. 21. 521.1 indexed citations
20.
Swindle, T. D., Marc W. Caffee, C. M. Hohenberg, G. B. Hudson, & R. S. Rajan. (1984). Noble gases in SNC meteorites. Meteoritics and Planetary Science. 19. 318.68 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.