Marc Schut

4.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
88 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Marc Schut is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Business and International Management and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Marc Schut has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 18 papers in Business and International Management and 10 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Marc Schut's work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (34 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (18 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (8 papers). Marc Schut is often cited by papers focused on Agricultural Innovations and Practices (34 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (18 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (8 papers). Marc Schut collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Kenya and Uganda. Marc Schut's co-authors include Cees Leeuwis, Laurens Klerkx, Piet van Asten, Annemarie van Paassen, Murat Sartas, M.A. Slingerland, Bernard Vanlauwe, L. Bastiaans, Jonne Rodenburg and A. van Ast and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Energy Policy and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Marc Schut

81 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

Sustainable intensification and the African smallholder f... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marc Schut Netherlands 28 1.3k 536 457 433 324 88 2.7k
N.G. Röling Netherlands 32 1.4k 1.1× 462 0.9× 371 0.8× 460 1.1× 593 1.8× 116 3.1k
James Sumberg United Kingdom 33 1.6k 1.2× 843 1.6× 402 0.9× 624 1.4× 254 0.8× 127 3.5k
Karlheinz Knickel Germany 20 1.6k 1.3× 827 1.5× 151 0.3× 282 0.7× 432 1.3× 46 2.9k
Graham Thiele Peru 28 935 0.7× 773 1.4× 277 0.6× 209 0.5× 208 0.6× 104 2.2k
John Thompson United Kingdom 21 784 0.6× 388 0.7× 169 0.4× 315 0.7× 622 1.9× 48 2.8k
Julie Ingram United Kingdom 29 1.5k 1.1× 828 1.5× 146 0.3× 284 0.7× 584 1.8× 67 3.1k
Emma Jakku Australia 20 734 0.6× 813 1.5× 122 0.3× 390 0.9× 434 1.3× 44 2.8k
Regina Birner Germany 32 1.3k 1.0× 398 0.7× 263 0.6× 537 1.2× 452 1.4× 161 3.6k
Gordon M. Hickey Canada 32 620 0.5× 438 0.8× 178 0.4× 330 0.8× 989 3.1× 152 3.2k
Alan Renwick New Zealand 27 1.2k 0.9× 377 0.7× 153 0.3× 255 0.6× 377 1.2× 117 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Marc Schut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marc Schut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marc Schut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marc Schut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marc Schut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marc Schut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marc Schut. The network helps show where Marc Schut may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marc Schut

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marc Schut. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marc Schut based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marc Schut. Marc Schut is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Douthwaite, Boru, et al.. (2023). Improving Scaling Performance in Research for Development: Learning from a Realist Evaluation of the Scaling Readiness Approach. European Journal of Development Research. 35(6). 1392–1418. 6 indexed citations
3.
Sekabira, Haruna, Leonhard Späth, Pius Krütli, et al.. (2022). Circular bioeconomy in African food systems: What is the status quo? Insights from Rwanda, DRC, and Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 17(10). e0276319–e0276319. 13 indexed citations
4.
Swedlund, Haley J., et al.. (2022). “Stop Calling Me a Youth!”: Understanding and Analysing Heterogeneity Among Ugandan Youth Agripreneurs. Africa Spectrum. 57(2). 178–203. 2 indexed citations
6.
Schut, Marc, et al.. (2019). Micro-livestock in smallholder farming systems: the role, challenges and opportunities for cavies in South Kivu, eastern DR Congo. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 52(3). 1167–1177. 4 indexed citations
7.
Sartas, Murat, Piet van Asten, Marc Schut, et al.. (2019). Factors influencing participation dynamics in research for development interventions with multi-stakeholder platforms: A metric approach to studying stakeholder participation. PLoS ONE. 14(11). e0223044–e0223044. 12 indexed citations
8.
Totin, Edmond, Alcade C. Segnon, Marc Schut, et al.. (2018). Institutional Perspectives of Climate-Smart Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 10(6). 1990–1990. 95 indexed citations
9.
Sartas, Murat, Marc Schut, Frans Hermans, Piet van Asten, & Cees Leeuwis. (2018). Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale. PLoS ONE. 13(6). e0197993–e0197993. 31 indexed citations
10.
Leeuwis, Cees, Annemarie van Paassen, Rico Lie, et al.. (2018). Innovation intermediation in a digital age: Comparing public and private new-ICT platforms for agricultural extension in Ghana. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 86-87(1). 64–76. 73 indexed citations
11.
Schut, Marc. (2017). The sustainability and success of innovation platforms. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 2 indexed citations
13.
Sartas, Murat, et al.. (2017). Scaling readiness: Accelerating the scaling of RTB interventions. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 2 indexed citations
14.
Lansink, Alfons Oude, et al.. (2016). A multi-level and multi-actor approach to risk governance: a conceptual framework to support policy development for Ambrosia weed control. Journal of Risk Research. 21(6). 780–799. 10 indexed citations
15.
Veenhuizen, R. van, et al.. (2016). Linking Urban Farming and Urban Planning in Times of Crisis. Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university). 31. 38–40. 1 indexed citations
16.
Schut, Marc, et al.. (2015). The state of innovation platforms in agricultural research for development. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 31–45. 3 indexed citations
17.
Schut, Marc, et al.. (2015). INNOVATION PLATFORMS: EXPERIENCES WITH THEIR INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDING IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT. Experimental Agriculture. 52(4). 537–561. 157 indexed citations
18.
Schut, Marc, Jonne Rodenburg, Laurens Klerkx, et al.. (2014). RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part II). Integrated analysis of parasitic weed problems in rice in Tanzania. Agricultural Systems. 132. 12–24. 41 indexed citations
19.
Schut, Marc. (2008). Mobilization of knowledge in competing claims context. A research proposal for studying: "Space for change in complex societal negotiation processes over natural resources". Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 23–33. 1 indexed citations
20.
Schut, Marc & Stephen Sherwood. (2007). FFSs in translation: Scaling up in name, but not in meaning.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 23(4). 28–29. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026