Manuela Sann

460 citations
11 papers · 300 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Manuela Sann

8 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Manuela Sann
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 230
  • Insect Science 97
  • Genetics 183
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 21
  • Plant Science 52
Replace Rodolpho S. T. Menezes with:
Rodolpho S. T. Menezes Brazil
Karina Carvalho Mancini Brazil
Tamara Spasojevic Switzerland
Jiang-Li Tan China
Tosca Koevoets Netherlands
Y. Miles Zhang United States
Jeanne Wilbrandt Germany
Filip Ruzicka Australia
Winifred Hallwachs United States
Shi Bao-cai China
Manuela Sann relative to Rodolpho S. T. Menezes Brazil Rodolpho S. T. Menezes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Rodolpho S. T. Menezes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Manuela Sann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manuela Sann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manuela Sann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manuela Sann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Manuela Sann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manuela Sann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manuela Sann. The network helps show where Manuela Sann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Manuela Sann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Manuela Sann Line = papers co-authored together Manuela Sann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2018135
2 201774
3 201663
4 202112
5 20207
6 20234
7 20213
8 20242
9 20250
10 20250
11 20240

About Manuela Sann

Manuela Sann is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 11 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (2 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (1 paper), Insect Pest Control Strategies (1 paper) and Fossil Insects in Amber (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (230 citations), Insect Science (97 citations), Genetics (183 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (21 citations) and Plant Science (52 citations). Manuela Sann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Oliver Niehuis, Karen Meusemann, Ralph S. Peters, Christoph Mayer, Lars Podsiadłowski, Bernhard Misof, Christoph Bleidorn, Michael Ohl, S Bank and Alexey M. Kozlov. Their work appears in journals such as Insect Conservation and Diversity, Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Systematic Entomology and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact