This map shows the geographic impact of Manuel Lorca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manuel Lorca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manuel Lorca more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manuel Lorca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manuel Lorca. The network helps show where Manuel Lorca may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Manuel Lorca
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Manuel Lorca.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Manuel Lorca based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Manuel Lorca. Manuel Lorca is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (2009). Aportación al estudio fitosociológico de los matorrales del sector Rondeño. Studia Botanica. 6(6). 39–45.2 indexed citations
5.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (2009). Notas sobre vegetación nitrófila, I. Studia Botanica. 4(4). 27–33.1 indexed citations
6.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (2009). Introducción al conocimiento fitotopográf ico de Baja California (Mexico). Studia Botanica. 9(9). 25–39.1 indexed citations
7.
Rodríguez, Inmaculada, Manuel Lorca, Ronan Boulic, & D. Meziat. (2003). Approximating Human Reaching Volumes using Inverse Kinematics. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 81–88.1 indexed citations
8.
Lorca, Manuel & Marcelino de la Cruz. (1996). El paisaje vegetal de la cuenca del río Henares (I): comunidades arbóreas y arbustivas. 335–396.5 indexed citations
9.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1992). Crecimiento de plántulas de haya ("F. Sylvatica" L.) en el Sistema Central. 9–22.1 indexed citations
10.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1991). Mortalidad de plántulas de Haya ("Fagus sylvatica L.") durante los meses de verano en el Sistema Central (España). 127–138.1 indexed citations
11.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1990). Los sabinares albares de la provincia de Guadalajara. 381–390.1 indexed citations
12.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1990). New plants and new areas for the flora of West Andalusia.. Lagascalia. 16(1). 125–129.5 indexed citations
13.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1988). Algunas comunidades vegetales higrófilas e higronitrófilas estivo-autumnales de la provincia de Granada. 37(37). 271–279.5 indexed citations
14.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1988). Notas sobre vegetación nitrófila, III: Contribución al estudio de la clase Bidentetea tripartitae en España. 37(37). 307–316.8 indexed citations
15.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1985). Notes on nitrophilous vegetation, I. Studia Botanica. 4. 27–33.1 indexed citations
16.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1983). Sobre la clase "Pegano-Salsoletea: Helichryso-Santolinetalia" ord. nov. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid. 40(2). 437–444.4 indexed citations
17.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1983). Síntesis Corológica de la provincia de Ciudad Real. 171–199.2 indexed citations
18.
Lorca, Manuel. (1982). El paisaje vegetal ciudarrealeño. 15–38.
19.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1981). Notas corológicas sobre las provincias Orocantábrica y Atlántica. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid. 38(2). 532–534.2 indexed citations
20.
Lorca, Manuel, et al.. (1979). "Centaurea diffusa" Lam., nueva para la Península Ibérica. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid. 36(1). 139–142.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.