Maarten Piot
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
-
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 5
- Emotion and Mood Recognition 1
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 3
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 2
- Co-authors
- Egon Dejonckheere (4 shared papers)Merijn Mestdagh (5 shared papers)Stijn Verdonck (4 shared papers)Francis Tuerlinckx (2 shared papers)Peter Kuppens (3 shared papers)Jeroen Weermeijer (2 shared papers)Fionneke M. Bos (1 shared paper)Harriëtte Riese (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Internet Interventions (2 papers)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)Psychological Assessment (1 paper)Frontiers in Digital Health (1 paper)JMIR Formative Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
Maarten Piot
6 papers receiving 172 citations
Maarten Piot's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Applied Psychology 51
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
- Clinical Psychology 40
- Psychiatry and Mental health 12
- Cognitive Neuroscience 13
Countries citing papers authored by Maarten Piot
This map shows the geographic impact of Maarten Piot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maarten Piot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maarten Piot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maarten Piot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maarten Piot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maarten Piot. The network helps show where Maarten Piot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Maarten Piot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | m-Path: an easy-to-use and highly tailorable platform for ecological momentary assessment and intervention in behavioral research and clinical practice Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 81 |
| 2 | 2022 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 1 |
About Maarten Piot
Maarten Piot is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 6 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper) and Emotion and Mood Recognition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (51 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations), Clinical Psychology (40 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (12 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (13 citations). Maarten Piot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Egon Dejonckheere, Merijn Mestdagh, Stijn Verdonck, Francis Tuerlinckx, Peter Kuppens, Jeroen Weermeijer, Fionneke M. Bos, Harriëtte Riese, J.I. Andries and Inez Myin‐Germeys. Their work appears in journals such as Internet Interventions, Computers in Human Behavior, Psychological Assessment, Frontiers in Digital Health and JMIR Formative Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.