M. Zabiégo
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Aerospace Engineering top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Biomedical Engineering
- Topics
- Magnetic confinement fusion research (20 papers)Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (12 papers)Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
M. Zabiégo
25 papers receiving 518 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 503
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 302
- Aerospace Engineering 205
- Materials Chemistry 130
- Biomedical Engineering 99
Countries citing papers authored by M. Zabiégo
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Zabiégo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Zabiégo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Zabiégo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Zabiégo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Zabiégo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Zabiégo. The network helps show where M. Zabiégo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Zabiégo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Zabiégo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Zabiégo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Zabiégo. M. Zabiégo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | The KROTOS KFC and SERENA/KS1 tests: experimental results and MC3D calculations | 7 |
| 5 | FARM: a new tool for optimizing the core performance and safety characteristics of gas cooled fast reactor cores | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Multi-Dimensional Approaches in Severe Accident Modelling and Analyses | 11 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | Rotation and shape dependence of neoclassical tearing mode thresholds on JET | 0 |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 72 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 89 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About M. Zabiégo
M. Zabiégo is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (20 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (12 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (503 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (302 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (205 citations). M. Zabiégo has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include G. Giruzzi, X. Garbet, S. Günter, S. Bernabei, A. Cardinali, T. A. Gianakon, G. Gantenbein, D. Wagner, W. Suttrop and ASDEX Upgrade Team. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Materials, Physics of Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.