M Winnem

12 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

M Winnem
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Pharmacology 249
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 129
  • Occupational Therapy 21
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 29
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 50
Replace Philip Decina with:
Philip Decina Canada
Anurina Das Australia
A. Faas Netherlands
Greg McIntosh Canada
Meridel I. Gatterman United States
Matthew Fernandez Australia
Annika Rosenbaum Denmark
Nadège Lemeunier Canada
Nels L. Carlson United States
Rachel Goldgrub Canada
M Winnem relative to Philip Decina Canada Philip Decina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Philip Decina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M Winnem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M Winnem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Winnem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Winnem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M Winnem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Winnem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Winnem. The network helps show where M Winnem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside M Winnem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M Winnem Line = papers co-authored together M Winnem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200581
2 200264
3 200262
4 200054
5 200622
6 198812
7
[Assessment of one's own functional status. COOP-WONCA questionnaire charts in clinical practice and research].
199711
8 19867
9
[Sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine in general practice].
19944
10
[Short-term absenteeism in Norwegian industry].
19931
11
[Diagnosis of migraine in general practice].
19931
12 19871
13 19900

About M Winnem

M Winnem is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 13 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (1 paper), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper) and Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (249 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (129 citations), Occupational Therapy (21 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (29 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (50 citations). M Winnem has collaborated with scholars based in Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gro Jamtvedt, Gunvor Hilde, Kåre Birger Hagen, KB Hagen, Bent Guttorm Bentsen, H. Piene, Bård Natvig, Johan Kvalvik Stanghelle, NI Landrø and Eva Skovlund. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Pain, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, European Heart Journal and International Journal of Sports Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact