Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Cluster Magnetic Field Investigation: overview of in-flight performance and initial results
20011.0k citationsA. Balogh, M. W. Dunlop et al.Annales Geophysicaeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. W. Dunlop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. W. Dunlop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. W. Dunlop more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. W. Dunlop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. W. Dunlop. The network helps show where M. W. Dunlop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. W. Dunlop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. W. Dunlop.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. W. Dunlop based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. W. Dunlop. M. W. Dunlop is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dunlop, M. W., et al.. (2012). On the importance of IMF |BY| on polar cap patch formation. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 3991.2 indexed citations
3.
Zhang, Pu, Xin Zhou, M. W. Dunlop, et al.. (2009). Statistic study on global shape of dayside magnetopause reconnection X line: based on Cluster & TC1 observations. AGUFM. 2009.1 indexed citations
Zong, Qiugang, T. A. Fritz, S. Y. Fu, et al.. (2005). The Magnetospheric Cusp: Structure and Dynamics. Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium). 598. 26.2 indexed citations
6.
Hasegawa, Hiroshi, B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, M. W. Dunlop, et al.. (2004). Structure of flux transfer events reconstructed from Cluster multi-spacecraft measurements: Evidence for component merging. 35. 539.1 indexed citations
Bosqued, J. M., M. W. Dunlop, M. G. G. T. Taylor, et al.. (2002). Spatial/temporal Structures Observed In The Mid-altitude Cusp: An Overview of Cluster Results. EGSGA. 2849.1 indexed citations
Elphic, R. C., M. W. Dunlop, A. Balogh, et al.. (2001). Transient Reconnection as Observed in the Cusp by Cluster and FAST. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2001.1 indexed citations
Balogh, A., M. W. Dunlop, S. W. H. Cowley, et al.. (1997). THE CLUSTER MAGNETIC FIELD INVESTIGATION. Space Science Reviews. 79(1-2). 65–91.251 indexed citations
Motschmann, U., et al.. (1995). Array Signal Processing Techniques. 371. 79.7 indexed citations
20.
Balogh, A., S. W. H. Cowley, M. W. Dunlop, et al.. (1993). The Cluster magnetic field investigation: Scientific objectives and instrumentation. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1159. 95–114.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.