F. S. Mozer

2.8k total citations
46 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

F. S. Mozer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, F. S. Mozer has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20 papers in Molecular Biology and 9 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in F. S. Mozer's work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (36 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (36 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (20 papers). F. S. Mozer is often cited by papers focused on Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (36 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (36 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (20 papers). F. S. Mozer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and France. F. S. Mozer's co-authors include W. D. González, R. B. Torbert, J. R. Wygant, R. H. Holzworth, Peter Lindqvist, A. Pedersen, S. D. Bale, T. D. Phan, C. A. Cattell and Alessandro Retinò and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

In The Last Decade

F. S. Mozer

45 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. S. Mozer United States 22 1.9k 944 430 126 120 46 2.0k
H. L. Collin United States 22 1.4k 0.7× 428 0.5× 417 1.0× 87 0.7× 93 0.8× 53 1.4k
L. J. Zanetti United States 28 2.5k 1.3× 1.5k 1.6× 721 1.7× 115 0.9× 99 0.8× 68 2.6k
S.‐I. Akasofu United States 24 1.8k 0.9× 877 0.9× 786 1.8× 65 0.5× 74 0.6× 48 1.9k
T. Yamamoto Japan 26 2.5k 1.3× 1.3k 1.4× 465 1.1× 277 2.2× 73 0.6× 94 2.5k
K. Tsuruda Japan 28 2.3k 1.2× 1.1k 1.2× 743 1.7× 159 1.3× 88 0.7× 123 2.4k
J. L. Roeder United States 29 2.2k 1.1× 931 1.0× 853 2.0× 68 0.5× 105 0.9× 90 2.3k
R. J. Fitzenreiter United States 24 1.9k 1.0× 605 0.6× 282 0.7× 174 1.4× 58 0.5× 56 1.9k
M. O. Chandler United States 22 1.7k 0.9× 636 0.7× 374 0.9× 53 0.4× 122 1.0× 54 1.8k
C.‐G. Fälthammar Sweden 22 1.2k 0.6× 509 0.5× 416 1.0× 121 1.0× 48 0.4× 53 1.3k
M. H. Boehm Germany 24 1.5k 0.8× 482 0.5× 522 1.2× 239 1.9× 54 0.5× 49 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by F. S. Mozer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. S. Mozer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. S. Mozer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. S. Mozer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. S. Mozer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. S. Mozer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. S. Mozer. The network helps show where F. S. Mozer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. S. Mozer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. S. Mozer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. S. Mozer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. S. Mozer. F. S. Mozer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bale, S. D. & F. S. Mozer. (2007). Measurement of Large Parallel and Perpendicular Electric Fields on Electron Spatial Scales in the Terrestrial Bow Shock. Physical Review Letters. 98(20). 205001–205001. 45 indexed citations
2.
Mozer, F. S. & Alessandro Retinò. (2007). Quantitative estimates of magnetic field reconnection properties from electric and magnetic field measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 112(A10). 38 indexed citations
3.
Mozer, F. S., et al.. (2004). Ion Accelerating by Turbulent Electric Fields in High-Altitude Cusp. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2004. 1 indexed citations
4.
Mozer, F. S., et al.. (2004). Energetic particles and turbulent electric fields in cusp. cosp. 35. 3187.
5.
Mozer, F. S., T. D. Phan, & S. D. Bale. (2003). The complex structure of the reconnecting magnetopause. Physics of Plasmas. 10(6). 2480–2485. 12 indexed citations
6.
Mozer, F. S., et al.. (2001). Through the Eye of the Needle: The Separator and its Environs. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2001. 1 indexed citations
7.
Bale, S. D., F. S. Mozer, M. André, et al.. (2001). The normal, thickness, and speed of the dusk magnetopause from Cluster Electric Field and Wave experiment measurements. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2001. 1 indexed citations
8.
Le, G., J. Raeder, C. T. Russell, et al.. (2001). Polar cusp and vicinity under strongly northward interplanetary magnetic field on April 11, 1997: Observations and MHD simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 106(A10). 21083–21093. 15 indexed citations
9.
Pedersen, A., N. C. Maynard, F. S. Mozer, et al.. (2000). Turbulent Structures in the Outer Cusp. 449. 291. 1 indexed citations
10.
Janhunen, P., Annika Olsson, F. S. Mozer, & H. Laakso. (1999). How does the U-shaped potential close above the acceleration region? A study using Polar data. Annales Geophysicae. 17(10). 1276–1276. 14 indexed citations
11.
Scudder, J. D., P. Puhl‐Quinn, F. S. Mozer, K. W. Ogilvie, & C. T. Russell. (1999). Generalized Walén tests through Alfvén waves and rotational discontinuities using electron flow velocities. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 104(A9). 19817–19833. 35 indexed citations
12.
Turner, N. E., D. N. Baker, T. I. Pulkkinen, et al.. (1998). High‐altitude polar cap electric field responses to southward turnings of the interplanetary magnetic field. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 103(A11). 26533–26545. 6 indexed citations
13.
Comfort, R. H., T. E. Moore, P. D. Craven, et al.. (1998). Spacecraft Potential Control by the Plasma Source Instrument on the POLAR Satellite. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 35(6). 845–849. 24 indexed citations
14.
Harvey, P., F. S. Mozer, D. Pankow, et al.. (1995). The electric field instrument on the polar satellite. Space Science Reviews. 71(1-4). 583–596. 168 indexed citations
15.
Hayakawa, H., T. Okada, Masaki Ejiri, et al.. (1990). Electric field measurement on the Akebono (EXOS-D) satellite.. Journal of geomagnetism and geoelectricity. 42(4). 371–384. 45 indexed citations
16.
Lindqvist, Peter & F. S. Mozer. (1990). The average tangential electric field at the noon magnetopause. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 95(A10). 17137–17144. 34 indexed citations
17.
Pedersen, A., C. A. Cattell, V. Formisano, et al.. (1984). Quasistatic electric field measurements with spherical double probes on the GEOS and ISEE satellites. Space Science Reviews. 37(3-4). 115 indexed citations
18.
Wygant, J. R., R. B. Torbert, & F. S. Mozer. (1983). Comparison of S3‐3 polar cap potential drops with the interplanetary magnetic field and models of magnetopause reconnection. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 88(A7). 5727–5735. 222 indexed citations
19.
Holzworth, R. H. & F. S. Mozer. (1979). Direct evaluation of the radial diffusion coefficient near L=6 due to electric field fluctuations. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 84(A6). 2559–2566. 54 indexed citations
20.
Berthelier, J. J., et al.. (1974). Electric field measurements near the southern polar cusp. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 21(5). 286–9. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026