M. Versteegen

682 total citations
26 papers, 261 citations indexed

About

M. Versteegen is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Versteegen has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 261 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 14 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 13 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in M. Versteegen's work include Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (13 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (12 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers). M. Versteegen is often cited by papers focused on Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (13 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (12 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers). M. Versteegen collaborates with scholars based in France, Germany and Belgium. M. Versteegen's co-authors include F. Gobet, F. Hannachi, M. Tarisien, M. M. Aléonard, V. Méot, J.-R. Marquès, Pascal Morel, G. Gosselin, T. Ceccotti and A. Compant La Fontaine and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

M. Versteegen

24 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Versteegen France 8 191 131 112 98 48 26 261
J. E. Ducret France 10 221 1.2× 137 1.0× 60 0.5× 119 1.2× 57 1.2× 22 271
O. Landoas France 8 216 1.1× 86 0.7× 70 0.6× 127 1.3× 80 1.7× 10 248
P. Hilz Germany 9 212 1.1× 128 1.0× 119 1.1× 38 0.4× 67 1.4× 17 238
N. E. Palmer United States 10 151 0.8× 79 0.6× 74 0.7× 58 0.6× 31 0.6× 32 212
L. A. Wilson United Kingdom 9 230 1.2× 157 1.2× 156 1.4× 84 0.9× 86 1.8× 25 313
G. Revet France 9 200 1.0× 129 1.0× 85 0.8× 42 0.4× 72 1.5× 21 250
А. В. Канцырев Russia 8 181 0.9× 79 0.6× 64 0.6× 81 0.8× 60 1.3× 35 250
Tobias Ostermayr Germany 10 246 1.3× 141 1.1× 131 1.2× 41 0.4× 75 1.6× 23 283
Lieselotte Obst-Huebl United States 9 227 1.2× 120 0.9× 94 0.8× 83 0.8× 97 2.0× 26 290
R. Costa United States 7 159 0.8× 81 0.6× 55 0.5× 88 0.9× 54 1.1× 14 220

Countries citing papers authored by M. Versteegen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Versteegen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Versteegen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Versteegen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Versteegen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Versteegen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Versteegen. The network helps show where M. Versteegen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Versteegen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Versteegen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Versteegen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Versteegen. M. Versteegen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Versteegen, M., P. Ascher, D. Atanasov, et al.. (2022). WISArD : Weak Interaction Studies with 32Ar Decay. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 449–449.
2.
Gobet, F., et al.. (2022). Expected yields ofTa181(e,e′)Ta*181in the multi-keV range with a plasma-cathode electron beam. Physical review. C. 105(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Gobet, F., J. Gardelle, M. Versteegen, et al.. (2020). A versatile and compact high-intensity electron beam for multi-kGy irradiation in nano- or micro-electronic devices. Applied Physics Letters. 116(4). 2 indexed citations
4.
Courtois, C., A. Compant La Fontaine, F. Gobet, et al.. (2020). Effect of plasma hydrodynamics on laser-produced bremsstrahlung MeV photon dose. Physics of Plasmas. 27(11). 1 indexed citations
5.
Blank, Β., P. Ascher, M. Gerbaux, et al.. (2020). Precision efficiency calibration of a high-purity co-axial germanium detector at low energies. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 984. 164631–164631.
6.
Atanasov, D., X. Fléchard, P. Ascher, et al.. (2020). Simultaneous measurements of the β-neutrino angular correlation in Ar32 pure Fermi and pure Gamow-Teller transitions using β-proton coincidences. Physical review. C. 101(5). 9 indexed citations
7.
Fontaine, A. Compant La, C. Courtois, F. Gobet, et al.. (2019). Bremsstrahlung spectrum and photon dose from short-pulse high-intensity laser interaction on various metal targets. Physics of Plasmas. 26(11). 17 indexed citations
8.
Ascher, P., D. Atanasov, Β. Blank, et al.. (2019). Scalar current limit from the beta-neutrino correlation: the WISArD experiment. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1308(1). 12003–12003. 2 indexed citations
9.
Versteegen, M., et al.. (2019). Role of the pre-plasma on electron beam currents from a biased laser-plasma. Review of Scientific Instruments. 90(5). 53306–53306. 2 indexed citations
10.
Tarisien, M., C. Baccou, F. Gobet, et al.. (2018). Scintillators in High-Power Laser-Driven Experiments. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 65(8). 2216–2219. 4 indexed citations
11.
12.
Tarisien, M., et al.. (2018). Optimization of critical-density gas jet targets for laser ion acceleration in the collisionless shockwave acceleration regime. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1079. 12004–12004. 2 indexed citations
13.
Pain, Jean‐Christophe, F. Gilleron, R. Piron, et al.. (2017). Analysis of the X-ray emission spectra of copper, germanium and rubidium plasmas produced at the Phelix laser facility. AIP conference proceedings. 1811. 70001–70001. 3 indexed citations
14.
Versteegen, M., V. Méot, F. Gobet, et al.. (2016). Low-energy modification of the γ strength function of the odd-even nucleus In115. Physical review. C. 94(4). 5 indexed citations
15.
Gobet, F., J. Caron, Igor Bessières, et al.. (2016). Experimental and Monte Carlo absolute characterization of a medical electron beam using a magnetic spectrometer. Radiation Measurements. 86. 16–23. 3 indexed citations
16.
Gosselin, G., V. Méot, Pascal Morel, et al.. (2015). Nuclear excitation by electron transition rate confidence interval in aHg201local thermodynamic equilibrium plasma. Physical Review C. 92(5). 7 indexed citations
17.
Hannachi, F., F. Gobet, M. Tarisien, et al.. (2014). Identification of X-ray spectra in the Na-like to O-like rubidium ions in the range of 3.8–7.3Å. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer. 148. 70–89. 8 indexed citations
18.
Gobet, F., et al.. (2013). Two parameter model of Fuji imaging plate response function to protons. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8779. 87791N–87791N. 2 indexed citations
19.
Gobet, F., et al.. (2013). Response functions of Fuji imaging plates to monoenergetic protons in the energy range 0.6–3.2 MeV. Review of Scientific Instruments. 84(1). 13508–13508. 50 indexed citations
20.
Gobet, F., F. Hannachi, M. Tarisien, et al.. (2011). Nuclear physics studies using high energy lasers. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 653(1). 80–83. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. E. Ducret Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by O. Landoas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. Hilz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N. E. Palmer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. A. Wilson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Revet Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by А. В. Канцырев Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tobias Ostermayr Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lieselotte Obst-Huebl Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Costa
Rankless by CCL
2026