V. Méot

1.5k total citations
73 papers, 645 citations indexed

About

V. Méot is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, V. Méot has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 645 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 41 papers in Radiation and 32 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in V. Méot's work include Nuclear physics research studies (41 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (34 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (28 papers). V. Méot is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (41 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (34 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (28 papers). V. Méot collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. V. Méot's co-authors include Pascal Morel, G. Gosselin, F. Gobet, F. Hannachi, M. Tarisien, M. M. Aléonard, J. N. Scheurer, P. Morel, G. Malka and O. Roig and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Applied Physics Letters.

In The Last Decade

V. Méot

71 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
V. Méot France 15 507 297 254 181 83 73 645
F. Hannachi France 17 846 1.7× 419 1.4× 290 1.1× 261 1.4× 45 0.5× 82 955
P. Thirolf Germany 13 817 1.6× 505 1.7× 184 0.7× 408 2.3× 74 0.9× 34 941
D. Gotta Germany 21 521 1.0× 552 1.9× 329 1.3× 122 0.7× 34 0.4× 72 952
J. D. Molitoris United States 13 580 1.1× 455 1.5× 294 1.2× 111 0.6× 119 1.4× 39 819
Å. Olin Canada 17 655 1.3× 387 1.3× 137 0.5× 181 1.0× 46 0.6× 66 900
L. M. Simons Switzerland 19 514 1.0× 491 1.7× 219 0.9× 134 0.7× 57 0.7× 45 821
D. P. McNabb United States 17 550 1.1× 206 0.7× 473 1.9× 49 0.3× 127 1.5× 43 754
Isaac Ghebregziabher United States 14 710 1.4× 579 1.9× 250 1.0× 298 1.6× 19 0.2× 30 888
M. Büscher Germany 15 548 1.1× 217 0.7× 82 0.3× 96 0.5× 43 0.5× 74 679
G. J. Williams United States 15 499 1.0× 271 0.9× 141 0.6× 266 1.5× 20 0.2× 55 645

Countries citing papers authored by V. Méot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. Méot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Méot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Méot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. Méot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Méot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Méot. The network helps show where V. Méot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. Méot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. Méot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. Méot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with V. Méot. V. Méot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Roig, O., et al.. (2025). SFγNCS, a multi-detector to characterize γ-ray cascades from nuclear reactions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1073. 170243–170243.
2.
Gaudefroy, L., et al.. (2025). Origin of the high-energy structures in the prompt-fission γ-ray spectrum of Cf252. Physical review. C. 111(3).
3.
Daugas, J. M., B. Rossé, D. L. Balabanski, et al.. (2021). Magnetic moment of the 11/2 isomeric state in Mo99 and neutron spin g factor quenching in A100 nuclei. Physical review. C. 104(2). 1 indexed citations
4.
Gobet, F., J. Gardelle, M. Versteegen, et al.. (2020). A versatile and compact high-intensity electron beam for multi-kGy irradiation in nano- or micro-electronic devices. Applied Physics Letters. 116(4). 2 indexed citations
5.
Jurado, B., P. Marini, M. Aïche, et al.. (2019). Experimental set-up for the simultaneous measurement of fission and γ-emission probabilities induced by transfer or inelastic-scattering reactions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 933. 63–70. 4 indexed citations
6.
Tarisien, M., C. Baccou, F. Gobet, et al.. (2018). Scintillators in High-Power Laser-Driven Experiments. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 65(8). 2216–2219. 4 indexed citations
7.
Gosselin, G., V. Méot, Pascal Morel, et al.. (2015). Nuclear excitation by electron transition rate confidence interval in aHg201local thermodynamic equilibrium plasma. Physical Review C. 92(5). 7 indexed citations
8.
Bélier, G., E. M. Bond, D. J. Vieira, et al.. (2015). Integral cross section measurement of theU235(n,n)U235mreaction in a pulsed reactor. Physical Review C. 91(4). 2 indexed citations
9.
Ujić, P., F. de Oliveira Santos, M. Lewitowicz, et al.. (2013). Search for Superscreening Effects in a Superconductor. Physical Review Letters. 110(3). 32501–32501. 9 indexed citations
10.
Méot, V., G. Gosselin, & Pascal Morel. (2013). Nuclear processes and nuclear decay modifications in plasmas. 1–1. 2 indexed citations
11.
Morel, Pascal, V. Méot, G. Gosselin, G. Faussurier, & C. Blancard. (2010). Calculations of nuclear excitation by electron capture (NEET) in nonlocal thermodynamic equilibrium plasmas. Physical Review C. 81(3). 14 indexed citations
12.
Malka, G., Ph. Nicolaï, E. Brambrink, et al.. (2008). Fast electron transport and induced heating in solid targets from rear-side interferometry imaging. Physical Review E. 77(2). 26408–26408. 11 indexed citations
13.
Brambrink, E., T. Schlegel, G. Malka, et al.. (2007). Direct evidence of strongly inhomogeneous energy deposition in target heating with laser-produced ion beams. Physical Review E. 75(6). 65401–65401. 16 indexed citations
14.
Gosselin, G., V. Méot, & Pascal Morel. (2007). Modified nuclear level lifetime in hot dense plasmas. Physical Review C. 76(4). 38 indexed citations
15.
Méot, V., Jean Aupiais, P. Morel, et al.. (2007). Half-life of the first excited state ofHg201. Physical Review C. 75(6). 16 indexed citations
16.
Matéa, I., G. Georgiev, J. M. Daugas, et al.. (2004). Magnetic Moment of the Fragmentation-AlignedF61e(9/2+)Isomer. Physical Review Letters. 93(14). 142503–142503. 12 indexed citations
17.
Morel, Pascal, et al.. (2004). Evaluation of nuclear excitation by electronic transition inU235plasma at local thermodynamic equilibrium. Physical Review A. 69(6). 27 indexed citations
18.
Granier, T., R. C. Haight, X. Ledoux, et al.. (2003). Measuring neutron-induced fission cross-section of shortlived actinides using a lead neutron-slowing-down spectrometer. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 506(1-2). 149–159. 10 indexed citations
19.
Blons, J., Dominique Goutte, A. Leprêtre, et al.. (1995). A new isomeric state in 65Ni. Nuclear Physics A. 582(1-2). 296–304. 2 indexed citations
20.
Platchkov, S., P. Bricault, J.M. Cavedon, et al.. (1988). Measurement of the1f72-Neutron-Orbit Radius inCa41. Physical Review Letters. 61(13). 1465–1468. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026