M. Verpelli

573 total citations
9 papers, 367 citations indexed

About

M. Verpelli is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Radiation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Verpelli has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 367 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 4 papers in Radiation and 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in M. Verpelli's work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (5 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers) and Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (3 papers). M. Verpelli is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (5 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers) and Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (3 papers). M. Verpelli collaborates with scholars based in Austria, United States and Belgium. M. Verpelli's co-authors include F. G. Kondev, H. Naik, R. Capote, O. Lebeda, F. Tárkányi, S. V. Suryanarayana, Α. Hermanne, T. Kibédi, A. Luca and Jonathan W. Engle and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nuclear Physics A and Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

M. Verpelli

9 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Verpelli Austria	7	201	198	148	121	93	9	367
Arnaud Guertin France	14	301 1.5×	311 1.6×	124 0.8×	50 0.4×	88 0.9×	51	519
K. Hilgers Germany	8	154 0.8×	240 1.2×	72 0.5×	87 0.7×	43 0.5×	10	315
Charlotte Duchemin France	12	166 0.8×	241 1.2×	81 0.5×	40 0.3×	62 0.7×	36	345
Vincent Métivier France	12	307 1.5×	237 1.2×	70 0.5×	87 0.7×	51 0.5×	46	449
Tatsuya Katabuchi Japan	9	236 1.2×	75 0.4×	172 1.2×	55 0.5×	66 0.7×	69	298
R. Adam Rebeles Belgium	16	277 1.4×	324 1.6×	166 1.1×	166 1.4×	83 0.9×	29	476
M. M. Musthafa India	11	167 0.8×	98 0.5×	94 0.6×	195 1.6×	57 0.6×	51	361
S.F. Kovalev Russia	17	332 1.7×	415 2.1×	188 1.3×	183 1.5×	98 1.1×	27	560
V. F. Batyaev Russia	10	215 1.1×	57 0.3×	147 1.0×	131 1.1×	58 0.6×	46	283
S. Spellerberg Germany	15	266 1.3×	381 1.9×	116 0.8×	128 1.1×	82 0.9×	40	556

Countries citing papers authored by M. Verpelli

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Verpelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Verpelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Verpelli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Verpelli

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Verpelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Verpelli. The network helps show where M. Verpelli may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Verpelli

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Verpelli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Verpelli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Verpelli. M. Verpelli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Pritychenko, B., B. Singh, & M. Verpelli. (2022). Systematic trends of 02+, 11−, 31− and 21+ excited states in even-even nuclei. Nuclear Physics A. 1027. 122511–122511. 7 indexed citations

2.

Engle, Jonathan W., A. V. Ignatyuk, R. Capote, et al.. (2019). Recommended Nuclear Data for the Production of Selected Therapeutic Radionuclides. Nuclear Data Sheets. 155. 56–74. 29 indexed citations

3.

Tárkányi, F., A. V. Ignatyuk, Α. Hermanne, et al.. (2019). Recommended nuclear data for medical radioisotope production: diagnostic positron emitters. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 319(2). 533–666. 57 indexed citations

4.

Tárkányi, F., A.V. Ignatyuk, Α. Hermanne, et al.. (2018). Recommended nuclear data for medical radioisotope production: diagnostic gamma emitters. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 319(2). 487–531. 45 indexed citations

5.

Hermanne, Α., A. V. Ignatyuk, R. Capote, et al.. (2018). Reference Cross Sections for Charged-particle Monitor Reactions. Nuclear Data Sheets. 148. 338–382. 187 indexed citations

6.

Capote, R., Alan L. Nichols, F.M. Nortier, et al.. (2017). IAEA coordinated research project on nuclear data for charged-particle monitor reactions and medical isotope production. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 146. 8007–8007. 3 indexed citations

7.

Abriola, D. & M. Verpelli. (2011). Information Management Tools for Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF) Interrogation and Dissemination. Journal of the Korean Physical Society. 59(2(3)). 1322–1324. 10 indexed citations

8.

Verpelli, M., et al.. (2008). HANDBOOK OF NUCLEAR DATA FOR SAFEGUARDS: DATABASE EXTENSIONS, AUGUST 2008. 28 indexed citations

9.

Preparata, G., Philip G. Ratcliffe, & M. Verpelli. (1991). $R_{e^ + e^ - } ,\,\Gamma _{had}^{Z^0 } $ AND α_s: DO THE EXPERIMENTAL DATA AGREE WITH PERTURBATIVE QCD?. Modern Physics Letters A. 6(7). 605–610. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact