M. ten Have

6.6k total citations
7 papers, 353 citations indexed

About

M. ten Have is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, M. ten Have has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 353 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in M. ten Have's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). M. ten Have is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). M. ten Have collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. M. ten Have's co-authors include Ron de Graaf, Ruud van Winkel, Jim van Os, Inez Myin‐Germeys, Martine van Nierop, Saskia van Dorsselaer, Nicole Günther, Eline J. Regeer, M. Bak and Leona Hakkaart‐van Roijen and has published in prestigious journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

M. ten Have

7 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. ten Have Netherlands	7	228	146	67	60	59	7	353
Carolyn M Crane United Kingdom	7	293 1.3×	160 1.1×	133 2.0×	107 1.8×	84 1.4×	9	436
Sabina Abidi Canada	13	315 1.4×	198 1.4×	44 0.7×	56 0.9×	37 0.6×	31	476
Laurent Holzer Switzerland	12	212 0.9×	191 1.3×	52 0.8×	37 0.6×	34 0.6×	46	384
Ben Lomas Australia	6	266 1.2×	128 0.9×	95 1.4×	77 1.3×	29 0.5×	6	345
Halis Ulaş Türkiye	13	206 0.9×	168 1.2×	76 1.1×	32 0.5×	83 1.4×	27	362
Siân Lowri Griffiths United Kingdom	8	151 0.7×	150 1.0×	104 1.6×	54 0.9×	75 1.3×	23	458
Deirdre Jackson Ireland	11	231 1.0×	175 1.2×	114 1.7×	83 1.4×	35 0.6×	18	356
Janine N. Galione United States	16	424 1.9×	348 2.4×	74 1.1×	53 0.9×	135 2.3×	28	647
Ramin Mojtabai United States	9	266 1.2×	224 1.5×	123 1.8×	100 1.7×	97 1.6×	9	434
P Corcoran Ireland	4	268 1.2×	265 1.8×	55 0.8×	64 1.1×	85 1.4×	8	471

Countries citing papers authored by M. ten Have

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. ten Have's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. ten Have with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. ten Have more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. ten Have

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. ten Have. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. ten Have. The network helps show where M. ten Have may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. ten Have

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. ten Have. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. ten Have based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. ten Have. M. ten Have is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Myin‐Germeys, Inez, Martine van Nierop, M. ten Have, et al.. (2018). ‘False-positive’ self-reported psychotic experiences in the general population: an investigation of outcome, predictive factors and clinical relevance. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. 28(5). 532–543. 41 indexed citations

Boyd, Anders, Sarah Van de Velde, M. ten Have, et al.. (2015). Gender Differences in Psychotropic Use Across Europe: Results From a Large Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Study. European Psychiatry. 30(6). 778–788. 58 indexed citations

Nierop, Martine van, Jim van Os, Nicole Günther, et al.. (2013). Does social defeat mediate the association between childhood trauma and psychosis? Evidence from the NEMESIS‐2 Study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 129(6). 467–476. 59 indexed citations

Smeets, Feikje, Tineke Lataster, Ruud van Winkel, et al.. (2012). Testing the hypothesis that psychotic illness begins when subthreshold hallucinations combine with delusional ideation. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 127(1). 34–47. 39 indexed citations

Nierop, Martine van, Jim van Os, Nicole Günther, et al.. (2011). Phenotypically Continuous With Clinical Psychosis, Discontinuous in Need for Care: Evidence for an Extended Psychosis Phenotype. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 38(2). 231–238. 78 indexed citations

Janzing, Joost, Ron de Graaf, M. ten Have, et al.. (2009). Familiality of depression in the community; associations with gender and phenotype of major depressive disorder. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 44(12). 1067–1074. 13 indexed citations

Roijen, Leona Hakkaart‐van, et al.. (2004). The societal costs and quality of life of patients suffering from bipolar disorder in the Netherlands. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 110(5). 383–392. 65 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact