M. Stecker

454 total citations
11 papers, 343 citations indexed

About

M. Stecker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Stecker has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 343 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Sensory Systems and 3 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in M. Stecker's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 papers) and Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (3 papers). M. Stecker is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 papers) and Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (3 papers). M. Stecker collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Switzerland. M. Stecker's co-authors include Roland Laszig, J. Müller-Deile, Norbert Dillier, Ernst von Wallenberg, Wai Kong Lai, C. Frohne, Rudolf Probst, Martin Westhofen, Thomas Linder and Thomas Klenzner and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, Otology & Neurotology and The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

In The Last Decade

M. Stecker

11 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Stecker Germany	7	302	223	126	47	46	11	343
Ron D. Chambers United States	11	342 1.1×	231 1.0×	92 0.7×	50 1.1×	29 0.6×	16	398
Paul Boyd United Kingdom	10	291 1.0×	199 0.9×	88 0.7×	79 1.7×	51 1.1×	21	345
R. Hollow Australia	9	418 1.4×	245 1.1×	190 1.5×	47 1.0×	93 2.0×	16	455
Gert Joseph Germany	9	407 1.3×	238 1.1×	216 1.7×	26 0.6×	55 1.2×	9	439
Christine Menapace United States	8	348 1.2×	197 0.9×	156 1.2×	50 1.1×	122 2.7×	9	380
Amy P. Olund United States	9	312 1.0×	221 1.0×	179 1.4×	55 1.2×	59 1.3×	13	352
Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan France	11	320 1.1×	184 0.8×	120 1.0×	78 1.7×	51 1.1×	22	385
Maria-Izabel Kós Switzerland	8	365 1.2×	257 1.2×	164 1.3×	47 1.0×	123 2.7×	14	391
Jean Pierre Piron France	7	257 0.9×	151 0.7×	64 0.5×	83 1.8×	22 0.5×	12	305
L García-Ibáñez Spain	9	293 1.0×	230 1.0×	136 1.1×	78 1.7×	55 1.2×	17	332

Countries citing papers authored by M. Stecker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Stecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Stecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Stecker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Stecker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Stecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Stecker. The network helps show where M. Stecker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Stecker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Stecker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Stecker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Stecker. M. Stecker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Laszig, Roland, Antje Aschendorff, M. Stecker, et al.. (2004). Benefits of Bilateral Electrical Stimulation with the Nucleus Cochlear Implant in Adults: 6-Month Postoperative Results. Otology & Neurotology. 25(6). 958–968. 160 indexed citations

2.

Lai, Wai Kong, J. Müller-Deile, Norbert Dillier, et al.. (2002). Measurement of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential via a Neural Response Telemetry System. Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology. 111(5). 407–414. 96 indexed citations

3.

Stecker, M., et al.. (2000). Topodiagnosis of deafness: strategy for treatment of neurofibromatosis type 2. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 114(S27). 3–7. 9 indexed citations

4.

Stecker, M., et al.. (2000). Stimulation of the cochlear nucleus with multichannel auditory brainstem implants and long-term results: Freiburg patients. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 114(S27). 27–31. 19 indexed citations

5.

Klenzner, Thomas, et al.. (1999). Zur Indikationserweiterung des „cochlear-implant”. HNO. 47(2). 95–100. 22 indexed citations

6.

Klenzner, Thomas, et al.. (1999). Zur Indikationserweiterung des „cochlear-implant”Freiburger Ergebnisse bei Patienten mit Resthörigkeit. 47(2). 95–100. 11 indexed citations

7.

Schorn, K. & M. Stecker. (1988). [Evoked response audiometry in pediatric audiology].. PubMed. 67(2). 78–83. 1 indexed citations

8.

Schorn, K., et al.. (1986). Voruntersuchungen gehörloser Patienten zur Cochlea-Implantation*. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 65(3). 114–117. 2 indexed citations

9.

Stecker, M.. (1982). Objektive Hörgeräte-Anpassung. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 61(12). 678–682. 3 indexed citations

10.

Pfaff, John F. & M. Stecker. (1976). Loudness level and frequency content of noise in the animal house. Laboratory Animals. 10(2). 111–117. 15 indexed citations

11.

Stecker, M.. (1974). Einflu� der Click-Flankensteilheit auf die fr�hen Reizantworten des H�rsystems. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 206(3). 225–234. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact