M. Smith‐Barbour
Impact in
- Physiology top 5%
- Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 9
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 3
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 3
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 3
- Co-authors
- John W. Phillis (11 shared papers)Michael H. O’Regan (10 shared papers)Louise M. Perkins (7 shared papers)Richard E. Leach (2 shared papers)Michael P. Diamond (2 shared papers)Elizabeth Dawe (1 shared paper)James W. Burns (1 shared paper)Yuval Yaron (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neurochemical Research (2 papers)Brain Research (2 papers)Life Sciences (1 paper)Neuropharmacology (1 paper)Neuroreport (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
M. Smith‐Barbour
13 papers receiving 524 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Physiology 81
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 255
- Neurology 98
- Developmental Neuroscience 31
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 27
Countries citing papers authored by M. Smith‐Barbour
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Smith‐Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Smith‐Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Smith‐Barbour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Smith‐Barbour
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Smith‐Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Smith‐Barbour. The network helps show where M. Smith‐Barbour may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside M. Smith‐Barbour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 128 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 116 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 72 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 50 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 43 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 35 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 20 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 13 | Lysyl oxidase transcripts in peritoneal adhesions and incisional scars. | 1999 | 3 |
About M. Smith‐Barbour
M. Smith‐Barbour is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (2 papers) and Hernia repair and management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (81 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (255 citations), Neurology (98 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (31 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (27 citations). M. Smith‐Barbour has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include John W. Phillis, Michael H. O’Regan, Louise M. Perkins, Richard E. Leach, Michael P. Diamond, Elizabeth Dawe, James W. Burns, Yuval Yaron, Susan M. Wykes and Stephen A. Krawetz. Their work appears in journals such as Neurochemical Research, Brain Research, Life Sciences, Neuropharmacology and Neuroreport.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.