M. Schultz

761 total citations
31 papers, 503 citations indexed

About

M. Schultz is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Schultz has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 503 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 17 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in M. Schultz's work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (23 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (17 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (17 papers). M. Schultz is often cited by papers focused on Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (23 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (17 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (17 papers). M. Schultz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Russia. M. Schultz's co-authors include G. Rüdiger, Rainer Hollerbach, Günther Rüdiger, M. Küker, Frank Stefani, Thomas Gundrum, G. Gerbeth, Jacek Szklarski, M. Gellert and D. A. Shalybkov and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

M. Schultz

28 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Schultz Germany 11 456 224 90 31 22 31 503
M. Gellert Germany 12 304 0.7× 181 0.8× 47 0.5× 16 0.5× 19 0.9× 27 403
Christophe Gissinger France 11 222 0.5× 188 0.8× 64 0.7× 8 0.3× 16 0.7× 26 334
G. Rüdiger Germany 13 560 1.2× 221 1.0× 40 0.4× 16 0.5× 4 0.2× 29 610
Tobias Heinemann United Kingdom 10 504 1.1× 136 0.6× 44 0.5× 24 0.8× 3 0.1× 18 553
Changqing Xiang China 17 583 1.3× 221 1.0× 61 0.7× 15 0.5× 14 0.6× 52 728
J. M. Massaguer Spain 8 226 0.5× 71 0.3× 113 1.3× 5 0.2× 31 1.4× 16 329
Rossana De Marco Italy 11 234 0.5× 85 0.4× 14 0.2× 31 1.0× 8 0.4× 33 328
P. H. Keys United Kingdom 17 792 1.7× 227 1.0× 23 0.3× 17 0.5× 2 0.1× 38 818
Ulf Torkelsson Sweden 9 675 1.5× 101 0.5× 32 0.4× 14 0.5× 3 0.1× 26 688
Chris S. Hanson United States 9 170 0.4× 71 0.3× 11 0.1× 17 0.5× 6 0.3× 24 275

Countries citing papers authored by M. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Schultz. The network helps show where M. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Schultz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Schultz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Schultz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Schultz. M. Schultz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rüdiger, G. & M. Schultz. (2024). The gap-size influence on the excitation of magnetorotational instability in cylindricTaylor–Couette flows. Journal of Plasma Physics. 90(1). 3 indexed citations
2.
Rüdiger, Günther & M. Schultz. (2022). On the toroidal‐velocity antidynamo theorem under the presence of nonuniform electric conductivity. Astronomische Nachrichten. 343(5). 1 indexed citations
3.
Rüdiger, G., M. Schultz, & Rainer Hollerbach. (2021). Destabilization of super-rotating Taylor–Couette flows by current-free helical magnetic fields. Journal of Plasma Physics. 87(2).
4.
Rüdiger, G. & M. Schultz. (2020). Large-scale dynamo action of magnetized Taylor–Couette flows. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 493(1). 1249–1260. 1 indexed citations
5.
Rüdiger, G., M. Schultz, & L. L. Kitchatinov. (2015). Instability of magnetized and differentially rotating stellar radiation zones with high magnetic Mach number. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 456(3). 3004–3010. 3 indexed citations
6.
Galindo, V., G. Gerbeth, Thomas Gundrum, et al.. (2014). Experimental Evidence for Nonaxisymmetric Magnetorotational Instability in a Rotating Liquid Metal Exposed to an Azimuthal Magnetic Field. Physical Review Letters. 113(2). 24505–24505. 47 indexed citations
7.
Rüdiger, G., M. Gellert, M. Schultz, Rainer Hollerbach, & Frank Stefani. (2013). Astrophysical and experimental implications from the magnetorotational instability of toroidal fields. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 438(1). 271–277. 16 indexed citations
8.
Rüdiger, G., M. Schultz, & D. Elstner. (2010). The pinch-type instability of helical magnetic fields. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 4 indexed citations
9.
Rüdiger, G., M. Gellert, M. Schultz, & Rainer Hollerbach. (2010). Dissipative Taylor-Couette flows under the influence of helical magnetic fields. Physical Review E. 82(1). 16319–16319. 6 indexed citations
10.
Rüdiger, Günther, et al.. (2007). Theory of current-driven instability experiments in magnetic Taylor-Couette flows. Physical Review E. 76(5). 56309–56309. 13 indexed citations
11.
Stefani, Frank, Thomas Gundrum, G. Gerbeth, et al.. (2006). Experimental Evidence for Magnetorotational Instability in a Taylor-Couette Flow under the Influence of a Helical Magnetic Field. Physical Review Letters. 97(18). 184502–184502. 126 indexed citations
12.
Rüdiger, Günther, et al.. (2003). Linear magnetohydrodynamic Taylor-Couette instability for liquid sodium. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 67(4). 46312–46312. 46 indexed citations
13.
Shalybkov, D. A., G. Rüdiger, & M. Schultz. (2002). Nonaxisymmetric patterns in the linear theory of MHD Taylor-Couette instability. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 395(1). 339–343. 13 indexed citations
14.
Küker, M., G. Rüdiger, & M. Schultz. (2001). Circulation-dominated solar shell dynamo models with positive alpha-effect. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 374(1). 301–308. 98 indexed citations
15.
Elstner, D., G. Ruêdiger, & M. Schultz. (1996). THE NON-LINEAR GALACTIC DYNAMO. II. OSCILLATORY VERSUS STEADY SOLUTIONS. 306(3). 740–746. 2 indexed citations
16.
Hempelmann, A., J. H. M. M. Schmitt, M. Schultz, G. Ruêdiger, & K. Stȩpień. (1995). Coronal X-ray emission and rotation of cool main-sequence stars.. A&A. 294. 515–524. 2 indexed citations
17.
Rüdiger, G., L. L. Kitchatinov, M. Küker, & M. Schultz. (1994). Dynamo models with magnetic diffusivity-quenching. Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics. 78(1-4). 247–259. 15 indexed citations
18.
Schultz, M., D. Elstner, & G. Ruêdiger. (1994). The non-linear galactic dynamo I. Field strength and vertical parity. 286(1). 72–79. 4 indexed citations
19.
Ruêdiger, G., D. Elstner, & M. Schultz. (1993). Dynamo-driven accretion in galaxies. 270. 53–59. 3 indexed citations
20.
Schultz, M., et al.. (1993). Complete Alpha-Tensor for Solar Dynamo. Symposium - International Astronomical Union. 157. 25–26. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026