M. Schott

11.2k total citations
29 papers, 255 citations indexed

About

M. Schott is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Schott has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 255 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 7 papers in Radiation and 6 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in M. Schott's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (18 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (16 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (12 papers). M. Schott is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (18 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (16 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (12 papers). M. Schott collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Italy. M. Schott's co-authors include Derek Kennedy, K. Mönig, M. A. Baak, J. Haller, Hans H. Goebel, Andreas Hoecker, J. Stelzer, Antoni Szczurek, M. Dyndał and Mariola Kłusek-Gawenda and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physics Letters B and Physical review. D.

In The Last Decade

M. Schott

18 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Schott Germany 7 243 56 19 11 7 29 255
S. Xella Canada 8 267 1.1× 57 1.0× 13 0.7× 7 0.6× 3 0.4× 22 284
J. Katzy Germany 6 571 2.3× 58 1.0× 14 0.7× 13 1.2× 4 0.6× 11 581
B. Heinemann Germany 6 245 1.0× 70 1.3× 15 0.8× 9 0.8× 4 0.6× 10 256
A. Kotwal United States 6 165 0.7× 88 1.6× 16 0.8× 9 0.8× 4 0.6× 23 173
S. Monteil France 5 361 1.5× 34 0.6× 14 0.7× 7 0.6× 5 0.7× 5 369
E. L. Barberio Australia 6 269 1.1× 31 0.6× 16 0.8× 18 1.6× 7 1.0× 10 280
Domenico Bonocore Germany 6 234 1.0× 59 1.1× 14 0.7× 13 1.2× 5 0.7× 12 271
Susanne Westhoff Germany 11 510 2.1× 83 1.5× 27 1.4× 13 1.2× 3 0.4× 23 522
E. Yatsenko Germany 2 524 2.2× 51 0.9× 7 0.4× 9 0.8× 3 0.4× 2 532
A. Vollhardt Spain 7 421 1.7× 41 0.7× 34 1.8× 5 0.5× 3 0.4× 12 425

Countries citing papers authored by M. Schott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Schott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Schott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Schott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Schott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Schott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Schott. The network helps show where M. Schott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Schott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Schott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Schott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Schott. M. Schott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Neuhaus, F., et al.. (2024). NaNu: Proposal for a neutrino experiment at the SPS collider located at the North Area of CERN. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1064. 169327–169327.
2.
Camarda, S., Giancarlo Ferrera, & M. Schott. (2024). Determination of the strong-coupling constant from the Z-boson transverse-momentum distribution. The European Physical Journal C. 84(1). 6 indexed citations
3.
Cavoto, G., Markus Gruber, Timothy Hume, et al.. (2023). Operating the GridPix detector with helium-isobutane gas mixtures for a high-precision, low-mass Time Projection Chamber. Journal of Instrumentation. 18(10). P10035–P10035. 1 indexed citations
4.
Kłusek-Gawenda, Mariola, Antoni Szczurek, M. Dyndał, & M. Schott. (2022). Limits for anomalous magnetic and electric dipole moments of tau leptons from heavy-ion UPCs. 275–275.
5.
Harland-Lang, L. A., et al.. (2022). Two-photon decay of fully-charmed tetraquarks from light-by-light scattering at the LHC. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 274. 6007–6007. 1 indexed citations
6.
Januschek, F., et al.. (2022). Characterising a Single-Photon Detector for ALPS II. Journal of Low Temperature Physics. 209(3-4). 355–362. 5 indexed citations
7.
Schmieden, K. & M. Schott. (2021). Supax: A new axion search experiment usingsuperconductive cavities. 141–141. 1 indexed citations
8.
Khoze, Valentin V., Frank Krauss, & M. Schott. (2020). Large Effects from Small QCD Instantons: Making Soft Bombs at Hadron Colliders. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 7 indexed citations
9.
Dyndał, M., Mariola Kłusek-Gawenda, Antoni Szczurek, & M. Schott. (2020). Anomalous electromagnetic moments of τ lepton in γγ → τ+τ− reaction in Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC. Physics Letters B. 809. 135682–135682. 31 indexed citations
10.
Camarda, S., M. Boonekamp, Giuseppe Bozzi, et al.. (2019). DYTurbo: Fast predictions for Drell–Yan processes. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 35 indexed citations
11.
Facini, G., et al.. (2019). On the model dependence of fiducial cross-section measurements. Modern Physics Letters A. 34(38). 2050065–2050065.
12.
Farina, E. M., P. Iengo, M. Bianco, et al.. (2018). Construction and Performance Studies of Large Resistive Micromegas Quadruplets. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 174. 1005–1005. 1 indexed citations
13.
Dudder, A. C., T. Lin, M. Schott, & C. Valderanis. (2015). Development and study of a micromegas pad-detector for high rate applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 803. 29–35.
14.
Sidiropoulou, O., M. Bianco, H. O. Danielsson, et al.. (2015). Characterization of the ATLAS Micromegas quadruplet prototype. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 824. 578–580. 1 indexed citations
15.
Bianco, M., H. O. Danielsson, F. Kuger, et al.. (2014). Construction of a large-size four plane micromegas detector. 58. 4 indexed citations
16.
Schott, M. & M. Dunford. (2014). Review of single vector boson production in pp collisions at $$\sqrt{s} = 7$$ s = 7  TeV. The European Physical Journal C. 74(7).
17.
Schott, M., et al.. (2013). Increasing the Flux Measurement Range of an RF-SQUID Resonant Detection Circuit Using the Robust Symmetrical Number System. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 23(2). 1602910–1602910. 1 indexed citations
18.
Baak, M. A., Hans H. Goebel, J. Haller, et al.. (2012). Updated status of the global electroweak fit and constraints on new physics. The European Physical Journal C. 72(5). 133 indexed citations
19.
Schott, M.. (2008). Z boson production at LHC with first data. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 110(4). 42024–42024.
20.
Baranov, S. P., A. Barashkou, N. Benekos, et al.. (2006). Muon Detector Description as built and its Simulation for the ATLAS experiment. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 572(1). 14–15. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026