M. Schaffer

474 total citations
8 papers, 335 citations indexed

About

M. Schaffer is a scholar working on Immunology, Hematology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Schaffer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 335 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Immunology, 4 papers in Hematology and 2 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in M. Schaffer's work include T-cell and B-cell Immunology (5 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (4 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (4 papers). M. Schaffer is often cited by papers focused on T-cell and B-cell Immunology (5 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (4 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (4 papers). M. Schaffer collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. M. Schaffer's co-authors include Olle Ringdén, Olle Olerup, Mats Remberger, Jonas Mattsson, Richard F. Olsson, B-M Svahn, Mats Remberger, Olga Rickards, Lei Shi and Faviel F. González-Galarza and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Bone Marrow Transplantation and International Journal of Immunogenetics.

In The Last Decade

M. Schaffer

8 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Schaffer Sweden	6	238	159	63	63	40	8	335
Johan Törlén Sweden	10	224 0.9×	115 0.7×	43 0.7×	76 1.2×	48 1.2×	16	307
Søren Lykke Petersen Denmark	9	180 0.8×	146 0.9×	39 0.6×	65 1.0×	25 0.6×	33	305
Darius Sairafi Sweden	11	216 0.9×	155 1.0×	55 0.9×	82 1.3×	24 0.6×	13	312
F Garbrecht United States	9	310 1.3×	176 1.1×	43 0.7×	108 1.7×	55 1.4×	12	403
Zina Chir France	3	300 1.3×	105 0.7×	50 0.8×	74 1.2×	86 2.1×	5	317
T Chauncey United States	9	330 1.4×	98 0.6×	52 0.8×	133 2.1×	45 1.1×	12	362
Benjamin Watkins United States	10	137 0.6×	139 0.9×	42 0.7×	54 0.9×	25 0.6×	32	319
M. G. Kiehl Germany	9	329 1.4×	88 0.6×	49 0.8×	73 1.2×	107 2.7×	11	354
R M Y Barge Netherlands	6	209 0.9×	217 1.4×	137 2.2×	96 1.5×	56 1.4×	7	438
Mark Vander Lugt United States	6	294 1.2×	171 1.1×	40 0.6×	60 1.0×	38 0.9×	14	380

Countries citing papers authored by M. Schaffer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Schaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Schaffer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Schaffer. The network helps show where M. Schaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Schaffer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Schaffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Schaffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Schaffer. M. Schaffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Lenz, Georg, Judith D. Goldberg, Aleksandra Rizo, et al.. (2016). Sequence variants in patients with primary and acquired resistance to ibrutinib in the phase 3 MCL3001 (RAY) trial.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 34(15_suppl). 7570–7570. 2 indexed citations

2.

Olsson, Richard F., Mats Remberger, M. Schaffer, et al.. (2012). Graft failure in the modern era of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 48(4). 537–543. 182 indexed citations

3.

Hollenbach, Jill A., Danillo G. Augusto, C. Aláez, et al.. (2012). 16^th IHIW: Population Global Distribution of Killer Immunoglobulin‐like Receptor (KIR) and Ligands. International Journal of Immunogenetics. 40(1). 39–45. 29 indexed citations

4.

Hauzenberger, Dan, M. Schaffer, Olle Ringdén, et al.. (2008). Outcome of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients transplanted with matched unrelated donors vs allele‐mismatched donors: a single centre study. Tissue Antigens. 72(6). 549–558. 11 indexed citations

5.

Schaffer, M., et al.. (2003). Roles of HLA‐B, HLA‐C and HLA‐DPA1 incompatibilities in the outcome of unrelated stem‐cell transplantation. Tissue Antigens. 62(3). 243–250. 67 indexed citations

6.

Schaffer, M. & Olle Olerup. (2001). HLA‐AB typing by polymerase‐chain reaction with sequence‐specific primers: more accurate, less errors, and increased resolution compared to serological typing. Tissue Antigens. 58(5). 299–307. 35 indexed citations

7.

Schaffer, M. & Olle Olerup. (1997). A novel DRB1*13 allele (DRB1*1327) on a DR17, DQ2 haplotype with a DRB1*0301 sequence motif in the 2nd hyperpolymorphic region. Tissue Antigens. 49(2). 186–188. 8 indexed citations

8.

Gruber, Saskia, et al.. (1992). Mizoribine inhibits natural antibody production in a discordant xenograft model.. PubMed. 24(2). 717–717. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact