M. Sallé

916 total citations
11 papers, 84 citations indexed

About

M. Sallé is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Management and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Sallé has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 84 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 4 papers in Information Systems and Management and 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in M. Sallé's work include Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (4 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (4 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (4 papers). M. Sallé is often cited by papers focused on Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (4 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (4 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (4 papers). M. Sallé collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. M. Sallé's co-authors include Jan Smit, Jeroen C. Vink, J. Smit, Brian Bockelman, M. Lassnig, Paul Millar, L. Cornwall, M. Litmaath, F. Giacomini and Willem Elbers and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physical review. D and Journal of Physics Conference Series.

In The Last Decade

M. Sallé

11 papers receiving 83 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Sallé Netherlands	5	36	35	29	20	13	11	84
M. LeBlanc United States	6	91 2.5×	24 0.7×	57 2.0×	43 2.1×	7 0.5×	16	115
J. C-L. Tseng United Kingdom	6	91 2.5×	12 0.3×	74 2.6×	10 0.5×	15 1.2×	8	110
M. Sozzi Italy	5	47 1.3×	21 0.6×	10 0.3×	9 0.5×	9 0.7×	12	76
S. Braibant Italy	6	64 1.8×	20 0.6×	30 1.0×	27 1.4×	2 0.2×	12	123
R. Aben Canada	1	58 1.6×	15 0.4×	21 0.7×	12 0.6×	3 0.2×	4	68
P. H. Beauchemin United States	3	46 1.3×	39 1.1×	6 0.2×	3 0.1×	4 0.3×	4	100
S. Abdel Khalek Canada	2	66 1.8×	15 0.4×	21 0.7×	13 0.7×	3 0.2×	4	76
A. Zacchei Italy	4	37 1.0×	11 0.3×	105 3.6×	19 0.9×	5 0.4×	18	116
O. Abdinov Azerbaijan	2	64 1.8×	15 0.4×	21 0.7×	12 0.6×	3 0.2×	2	75
J. Abdallah Portugal	2	76 2.1×	15 0.4×	25 0.9×	12 0.6×	3 0.2×	2	86

Countries citing papers authored by M. Sallé

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Sallé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Sallé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Sallé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Sallé

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Sallé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Sallé. The network helps show where M. Sallé may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Sallé

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Sallé. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Sallé based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Sallé. M. Sallé is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Maggiore, R., A. Freise, A. Dmitriev, & M. Sallé. (2024). Tuning of resonant doublets in coupled optical cavities. Physical review. D. 109(2). 1 indexed citations

2.

Basney, Jim, L. Cornwall, Dave Dykstra, et al.. (2024). WLCG Transition from X.509 to Tokens. Status, Plans, and Timeline. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 295. 4054–4054. 1 indexed citations

3.

Bockelman, Brian, et al.. (2021). WLCG Token Usage and Discovery. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 251. 2028–2028. 1 indexed citations

4.

Millar, Paul, M. Lassnig, M. Litmaath, et al.. (2019). WLCG Authorisation; from X.509 to Tokens. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 9 indexed citations

5.

Kelsey, D. P., et al.. (2017). Can R&E federations trust Research Infrastructures? - The “Snctfi” Trust Framework. 24–24. 1 indexed citations

6.

Elbers, Willem, et al.. (2015). User Delegation in the CLARIN Infrastructure. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 14–24. 2 indexed citations

7.

Garzoglio, Gabriele, Joe Bester, K. Chadwick, et al.. (2011). Adoption of a SAML-XACML Profile for Authorization Interoperability across Grid Middleware in OSG and EGEE. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 331(6). 62011–62011. 2 indexed citations

8.

Sallé, M.. (2004). Kinks in the Hartree approximation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 69(2). 12 indexed citations

9.

Sallé, M. & Jan Smit. (2003). Hartree ensemble approximation revisited: The “symmetric phase”. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 67(11). 13 indexed citations

10.

Sallé, M., J. Smit, & Jeroen C. Vink. (2002). New initial conditions for quantum field simulations after a quench. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 106-107. 540–542. 5 indexed citations

11.

Sallé, M., Jan Smit, & Jeroen C. Vink. (2001). Thermalization in a Hartree ensemble approximation to quantum field dynamics. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 64(2). 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact