M. S. Tute

401 total citations
19 papers, 300 citations indexed

About

M. S. Tute is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, M. S. Tute has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 300 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Organic Chemistry, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 6 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in M. S. Tute's work include Synthesis and biological activity (4 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (3 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers). M. S. Tute is often cited by papers focused on Synthesis and biological activity (4 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (3 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers). M. S. Tute collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. M. S. Tute's co-authors include A. S. V. Burgen, Gordon C. K. Roberts, J. F. W. McOmie, John C. Mitchell, Anthony E. Beezer, G. A. Webb, Mourad Fawzi, Gabrielle Hawksworth, B. C. Jones and Paul G. Royall and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Langmuir and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

M. S. Tute

18 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. S. Tute United Kingdom 9 126 107 60 54 50 19 300
C. Hänsch Germany 7 122 1.0× 143 1.3× 23 0.4× 96 1.8× 87 1.7× 16 404
W. H. Hunter United Kingdom 11 110 0.9× 77 0.7× 29 0.5× 106 2.0× 31 0.6× 40 419
George A. Krudy United States 11 101 0.8× 177 1.7× 27 0.5× 62 1.1× 99 2.0× 21 418
Katrina E. Frankcombe Australia 6 131 1.0× 95 0.9× 40 0.7× 37 0.7× 135 2.7× 7 322
David W. Payling United Kingdom 13 111 0.9× 156 1.5× 15 0.3× 96 1.8× 23 0.5× 25 368
Edward A. Nodiff United States 12 276 2.2× 138 1.3× 27 0.5× 26 0.5× 30 0.6× 35 439
Sophia Kazanis United States 9 97 0.8× 260 2.4× 135 2.3× 59 1.1× 57 1.1× 11 504
G. Redl United States 6 120 1.0× 129 1.2× 17 0.3× 90 1.7× 187 3.7× 12 373
Michael S. Lawless United States 10 76 0.6× 117 1.1× 22 0.4× 39 0.7× 130 2.6× 23 345
Hans Peter Cordes Germany 8 85 0.7× 205 1.9× 13 0.2× 57 1.1× 42 0.8× 10 376

Countries citing papers authored by M. S. Tute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. S. Tute's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. S. Tute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. S. Tute more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. S. Tute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. S. Tute. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. S. Tute. The network helps show where M. S. Tute may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. S. Tute

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. S. Tute. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. S. Tute based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. S. Tute. M. S. Tute is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Jones, B. C., et al.. (1996). Putative active site template model for cytochrome P4502C9 (tolbutamide hydroxylase).. Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 24(2). 260–266. 59 indexed citations
2.
Montanari, Carlos A., M. S. Tute, Anthony E. Beezer, & John C. Mitchell. (1996). Determination of receptor-bound drug conformations by QSAR using flexible fitting to derive a molecular similarity index. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 10(1). 67–73. 18 indexed citations
3.
Beezer, Anthony E., Watson Loh, John C. Mitchell, et al.. (1994). An Investigation of Dilute Aqueous Solution Behavior of Poly(oxyethylene) + Poly(oxypropylene) + Poly(oxyethylene) Block Copolymers. Langmuir. 10(11). 4001–4005. 52 indexed citations
4.
Mitchell, Timothy J., G. A. Webb, & M. S. Tute. (1991). A molecular-orbital study of the structure-activity relationships of some imidazolidines related to clonidine. Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM. 227. 327–336. 1 indexed citations
5.
Mitchell, Timothy J., M. S. Tute, & G. A. Webb. (1989). A molecular modelling study of the interaction of noradrenaline with theβ 2-adrenergic receptor. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 3(3). 211–223. 7 indexed citations
6.
Tute, M. S., et al.. (1989). A conformation-dependent hydrophobicity index. Journal of Molecular Graphics. 7(3). 181–181. 1 indexed citations
7.
Mitchell, Timothy J., M. S. Tute, & G. A. Webb. (1989). A theoretical study of the influence of noradrenaline ring fluorination on its adrenergic activity. Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM. 187. 115–121. 3 indexed citations
8.
Saunders, Martin, M. S. Tute, & G. A. Webb. (1987). A theoretical study of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 1(2). 133–142. 7 indexed citations
9.
Saunders, Martin, G. A. Webb, & M. S. Tute. (1987). A theoretical study of solvent effects on molecular electronic properties. Journal of Molecular Structure. 158. 69–78. 9 indexed citations
10.
Burgen, A. S. V., Gordon C. K. Roberts, & M. S. Tute. (1986). Molecular graphics and drug design. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 53 indexed citations
11.
Grigg, Ronald, H. Q. Nimal Gunaratne, Visuvanathar Sridharan, S. THIANPATANAGUL, & M. S. Tute. (1983). X=Y-ZH systems as potential 1,3-dipoles. Activation of the ZH proton in imines. Tetrahedron Letters. 24(40). 4363–4366. 18 indexed citations
12.
Fawzi, Mourad, et al.. (1980). Rationalization of Drug Complexation in Aqueous Solution by use of Hückel Frontier Molecular Orbitals. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 69(1). 104–106. 23 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Richard A., et al.. (1971). The conformational analysis of saturated heterocycles. Part XXXV. 1-Phenoxymethyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolines. Journal of the Chemical Society B Physical Organic. 1325–1325.
14.
Coombes, Jason D., et al.. (1970). LABORATORY STUDIES ON TWO SYNTHETIC DIHYDROISOQUINOLINES (PFIZER UK 2054 and UK 2371). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 173(1). 462–476. 3 indexed citations
15.
Brammer, K. W., et al.. (1968). Antiviral Properties of 1-Phenoxymethyl-3,4-Dihydro and 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroisoquinolines. Nature. 219(5153). 515–517. 10 indexed citations
16.
Boulton, A. J., et al.. (1967). Pyrimidines. Part XV. The nitrosation of 4,6-dimethyl- and 4-methyl-6-phenyl-pyrimidin-2-ols. Journal of the Chemical Society C Organic. 1202–1202. 3 indexed citations
17.
McOmie, J. F. W., Alan B. Turner, & M. S. Tute. (1966). The structure of pulvilloric acid. Journal of the Chemical Society C Organic. 1608–1608. 7 indexed citations
18.
McOmie, J. F. W., et al.. (1964). 194. Pyrimidines. Part XIII. Electrophilic substitution at position 6 and a synthesis of divicine (2,4-diamino-5,6-dihydroxypyrimidine). Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed). 1001–1001. 4 indexed citations
19.
McOmie, J. F. W., et al.. (1960). 888. Pyrimidines. Part XI. Synthesis of 5-hydroxypyrimidine and related compounds. Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed). 4590–4590. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026