Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Rich nature of Van Hove singularities in Kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5
2022151 citationsYong Hu, Xianxin Wu et al.Nature Communicationsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Radović's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Radović with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Radović more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Radović. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Radović. The network helps show where M. Radović may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Radović
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Radović.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Radović based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Radović. M. Radović is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Krempaský, Juraj, Martin Gmitra, Mauro Fanciulli, et al.. (2021). Triple-Point Fermions in Ferroelectric GeTe. Physical Review Letters. 126(20). 206403–206403.16 indexed citations
12.
Tamai, A., Manuel Zingl, E. Rozbicki, et al.. (2019). High-Resolution Photoemission on Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub> Reveals Correlation-Enhanced Effective Spin-Orbit Coupling and Dominantly Local Self-Energies. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).100 indexed citations
13.
Kozina, M., M. Fechner, P. Maršík, et al.. (2019). Terahertz-driven phonon upconversion in SrTiO<sub>3</sub>. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).131 indexed citations
14.
Shi, M., Nan Xu, Hongming Weng, et al.. (2016). Observation of Weyl nodes and Fermi arcs in TaP. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016.5 indexed citations
15.
Gorgisyan, Ishkhan, Pavle Juranić, R. Ischebeck, et al.. (2015). The new design of the THz streak camera at PSI. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9512. 95120D–95120D.1 indexed citations
16.
Luca, G. M. De, R. Di Capua, Emiliano Di Gennaro, et al.. (2014). LaAlO 3 /EuTiO 3 /SrTiO 3 ヘテロ構造で形成された準二次元電子系の輸送特性. Physical Review B. 89(22). 1–224413.6 indexed citations
17.
Plumb, N. C., M. Salluzzo, E. Razzoli, et al.. (2013). Mixed dimensionality of confined conducting electrons tied to ferroelectric surface distortion on an oxide. arXiv (Cornell University).3 indexed citations
18.
Barfuss, Arne, M. R. Scholz, C. Blumenstein, et al.. (2013). 調節できるFermi準位を持つ元素トポロジカル絶縁体:InSb(001)上の歪があるα-Sn. Physical Review Letters. 111(15). 1–157205.13 indexed citations
Sassa, Yasmine, M. Radović, Martin Må̊nsson, et al.. (2011). 角度分解光電子分光法により明かされたYBa 2 Cu 3 O 7-δ 膜におけるオルソIIバンド折畳み. Physical Review B. 83(14). 1–140511.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.