M. R. C. Psych
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Judith L. RapoportAnjené AddingtonSophia FrangouL. K. George HsuDavid JonesRichard D. KrugmanMichael J. BrammerNigel Hymas
- Topics
- Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper)Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
M. R. C. Psych
10 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Psychiatry and Mental health 346
- Cognitive Neuroscience 256
- Molecular Biology 218
- Clinical Psychology 194
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 176
Countries citing papers authored by M. R. C. Psych
This map shows the geographic impact of M. R. C. Psych's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. R. C. Psych with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. R. C. Psych more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. R. C. Psych
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. R. C. Psych. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. R. C. Psych. The network helps show where M. R. C. Psych may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. R. C. Psych
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. R. C. Psych. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. R. C. Psych based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. R. C. Psych. M. R. C. Psych is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pain in 1,000 Women Treated for Breast Cancer A Prospective Study of Pain Sensitivity and Postoperative Pain | 15 |
| 2 | Origin and Impact of Stigma and Discrimination in Schizophrenia - Patients' Perception: Mumbai Study | 15 |
| 3 | The neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia: update 2005breakdown → | 752 |
| 4 | Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): Report of the consortium on DLB international workshop | 143 |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 6 |
About M. R. C. Psych
M. R. C. Psych is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience and Health Information Management, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper) and Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (115 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (346 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (53 citations). M. R. C. Psych has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Judith L. Rapoport, Anjené Addington, Sophia Frangou, L. K. George Hsu, David Jones, Richard D. Krugman, Michael J. Brammer, Nigel Hymas, Nicholas Hicks and Raymond Levy. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Child Abuse & Neglect.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.