M. Probst

30 papers receiving 754 citations

Peers

M. Probst
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Urology 295
  • Transplantation 34
  • Biomaterials 140
  • Surgery 463
  • Oncology 180
Replace Nadia Sessarego with:
Nadia Sessarego Italy
Hugo Burgos United Kingdom
Gregorio Castellanos Spain
Paula P.M.C. van Miert Netherlands
S. B. MORRIS United Kingdom
Annette H. Bruggink Netherlands
Masao Fujiwara Japan
Hitoshi Kurata Japan
Laura Carreras‐Planella Spain
Angela Webb Australia
M. Probst relative to Nadia Sessarego Italy Nadia Sessarego's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Nadia Sessarego · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Probst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Probst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Probst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Probst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Probst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Probst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Probst. The network helps show where M. Probst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Probst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Probst Line = papers co-authored together M. Probst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003165
2 1997144
3 1996125
4 200076
5 199761
6 200839
7 199533
8 200231
9 199925
10 199713
11 197812
12 199711
13 20066
14
[Mechanical anastomosis after anterior rectum resection].
19805
15 19944
16 20074
17 19943
18 19823
19
[Does a one-time colonic or rectal resection without protective colostomy increase the rate of postoperative complications?].
19793
20
[One-stage-resection of colon and rectum without protective colostomy -- a safe procedure (author's transl)].
19803

About M. Probst

M. Probst is a scholar working on Transplantation, Urology, Oncology, Gastroenterology and Surgery, having authored 32 papers that have together received 780 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (3 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (3 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers) and Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (295 citations), Transplantation (34 citations), Biomaterials (140 citations), Surgery (463 citations) and Oncology (180 citations). M. Probst has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Emil A. Tanagho, Ravinder Dahiya, Serge Carrier, Wassilios Bentas, Jan Buer, Jens Atzpodien, Dietger Jonas, M. Wolfram, J. Binder and Hans J. Piechota. Their work appears in journals such as Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery, British Journal of Cancer, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, British Journal of Haematology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026