M. Pimpinella

1.2k total citations
57 papers, 964 citations indexed

About

M. Pimpinella is a scholar working on Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Pimpinella has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 964 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Radiation, 35 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 17 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in M. Pimpinella's work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (41 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (35 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (20 papers). M. Pimpinella is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (41 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (35 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (20 papers). M. Pimpinella collaborates with scholars based in Italy, France and Germany. M. Pimpinella's co-authors include António Guerra, M. Marinelli, G. Verona‐Rinati, A. Petrucci, Anna Saran, Simonetta Rebessi, Vincenzo Di Majo, Emanuela Pasquali, Simonetta Pazzaglia and Mariateresa Mancuso and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Frontiers in Plant Science and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

In The Last Decade

M. Pimpinella

56 papers receiving 955 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Pimpinella Italy 15 673 645 422 127 81 57 964
V. Smyth United Kingdom 10 1.2k 1.9× 1.1k 1.7× 569 1.3× 159 1.3× 85 1.0× 15 1.5k
David Patin Switzerland 6 1.2k 1.8× 1.3k 2.0× 505 1.2× 76 0.6× 48 0.6× 13 1.5k
W. Laub United States 14 819 1.2× 662 1.0× 497 1.2× 214 1.7× 75 0.9× 37 957
L DeWerd United States 6 506 0.8× 401 0.6× 382 0.9× 168 1.3× 49 0.6× 18 697
Anthony Mascia United States 18 891 1.3× 944 1.5× 377 0.9× 55 0.4× 33 0.4× 51 1.2k
Dietrich Harder Germany 21 1.1k 1.6× 915 1.4× 570 1.4× 211 1.7× 40 0.5× 56 1.3k
Laura Caplier France 2 750 1.1× 861 1.3× 339 0.8× 47 0.4× 28 0.3× 3 989
Charles Robert Blackwell United States 5 915 1.4× 716 1.1× 547 1.3× 165 1.3× 32 0.4× 5 1.2k
Emil Schüler United States 17 828 1.2× 927 1.4× 571 1.4× 68 0.5× 28 0.3× 52 1.3k
G. Kragl Austria 13 819 1.2× 769 1.2× 435 1.0× 124 1.0× 33 0.4× 19 931

Countries citing papers authored by M. Pimpinella

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Pimpinella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Pimpinella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Pimpinella more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Pimpinella

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Pimpinella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Pimpinella. The network helps show where M. Pimpinella may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Pimpinella

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Pimpinella. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Pimpinella based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Pimpinella. M. Pimpinella is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Zink, Klemens, M. Pimpinella, P. Teles, et al.. (2020). Calculated beam quality correction factors for ionization chambers in MV photon beams. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 65(7). 75003–75003. 9 indexed citations
3.
D’Arienzo, Marco, et al.. (2020). Evaluation of the uncertainty associated with the ion recombination correction in high dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry: an MC approach. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 65(9). 09NT01–09NT01. 1 indexed citations
4.
Zink, Klemens, et al.. (2020). Monte Carlo calculation of quality correction factors based on air kerma and absorbed dose to water in medium energy x-ray beams. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 65(24). 245042–245042. 3 indexed citations
5.
Pimpinella, M., et al.. (2019). Output factor measurement in high dose-per-pulse IORT electron beams. Physica Medica. 61. 94–102. 18 indexed citations
6.
Desiderio, Angiola, Anna Maria Salzano, Andrea Scaloni, et al.. (2019). Effects of Simulated Space Radiations on the Tomato Root Proteome. Frontiers in Plant Science. 10. 1334–1334. 11 indexed citations
7.
Reggiori, Giacomo, A. Stravato, M. Pimpinella, et al.. (2017). Use of PTW-microDiamond for relative dosimetry of unflattened photon beams. Physica Medica. 38. 45–53. 12 indexed citations
8.
Batistoni, P., R. Villari, B. Obryk, et al.. (2017). OVERVIEW OF NEUTRON MEASUREMENTS IN JET FUSION DEVICE. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 180(1-4). 102–108. 4 indexed citations
9.
Pimpinella, M., et al.. (2017). Feasibility of using a dose-area product ratio as beam quality specifier for photon beams with small field sizes. Physica Medica. 45. 106–116. 3 indexed citations
10.
D’Arienzo, Marco, M. Pimpinella, M. Capogni, et al.. (2017). Phantom validation of quantitative Y-90 PET/CT-based dosimetry in liver radioembolization. EJNMMI Research. 7(1). 94–94. 47 indexed citations
11.
Russo, S., Giacomo Reggiori, E. Cagni, et al.. (2016). Small field output factors evaluation with a microDiamond detector over 30 Italian centers. Physica Medica. 32(12). 1644–1650. 23 indexed citations
12.
Masi, Laura, S. Russo, Paolo Francescon, et al.. (2016). CyberKnife beam output factor measurements: A multi-site and multi-detector study. Physica Medica. 32(12). 1637–1643. 36 indexed citations
13.
Marinelli, M., G. Verona‐Rinati, M.D. Falco, et al.. (2015). Characterization of a microDiamond detector in high-dose-per-pulse electron beams for intra operative radiation therapy. Physica Medica. 31(8). 897–902. 28 indexed citations
14.
Vadrucci, Monia, Giuseppe Esposito, C. Ronsivalle, et al.. (2015). Calibration of GafChromic EBT3 for absorbed dose measurements in 5 MeV proton beam and 60Co γ‐rays. Medical Physics. 42(8). 4678–4684. 37 indexed citations
15.
Marinelli, M., E. Milani, G. Prestopino, et al.. (2013). Characterization of a synthetic single crystal diamond Schottky diode for radiotherapy electron beam dosimetry. Medical Physics. 40(2). 21712–21712. 48 indexed citations
16.
Pimpinella, M., et al.. (2007). Dosimetric characteristics of electron beams produced by a mobile accelerator for IORT. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 52(20). 6197–6214. 38 indexed citations
17.
Guerra, António, et al.. (2006). Charge collection efficiency in ionization chambers exposed to electron beams with high dose per pulse. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 51(24). 6419–6436. 83 indexed citations
18.
Pimpinella, M., et al.. (2002). Determination of the Kwall correction factor for a cylindrical ionization chamber to measure air-kerma in 60Co gamma beams. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 47(14). 2411–2431. 8 indexed citations
19.
Guerra, Ana Sofía, et al.. (1996). Characteristics of the absorbed dose to water standard at ENEA. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 41(4). 657–674. 21 indexed citations
20.
Guerra, Ana Sofía, et al.. (1995). Experimental determination of the beam quality dependence factors, kQ, for ionization chambers used in photon and electron dosimetry. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 40(7). 1177–1190. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026