M. Philip Nott

25 total papers · 789 total citations
16 papers, 591 citations indexed

About

M. Philip Nott is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Philip Nott has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 591 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 10 papers in Ecology and 5 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in M. Philip Nott's work include Avian ecology and behavior (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). M. Philip Nott is often cited by papers focused on Avian ecology and behavior (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). M. Philip Nott collaborates with scholars based in United States. M. Philip Nott's co-authors include David F. DeSante, Rodney B. Siegel, Stuart L. Pimm, Peter Pyle, Robert D. Powell, John L. Curnutt, Julie L. Lockwood, D. Martin Fleming, Lisa L. Manne and Thomas M. Brooks and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Biology, Journal of Applied Ecology and Ecological Applications.

In The Last Decade

M. Philip Nott

16 papers receiving 501 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
M. Philip Nott	391	181	180	172	81	16	591
Hein van Gils	261 0.7×	177 1.0×	148 0.8×	196 1.1×	78 1.0×	29	635
Clément Tisseuil	215 0.5×	260 1.4×	228 1.3×	98 0.6×	63 0.8×	15	676
J. P. McMahon	274 0.7×	173 1.0×	152 0.8×	132 0.8×	72 0.9×	17	643
D.L. Orthmeyer	488 1.2×	111 0.6×	79 0.4×	72 0.4×	83 1.0×	29	580
Tom Langendoen	439 1.1×	144 0.8×	198 1.1×	251 1.5×	45 0.6×	11	602
Tracey Hollings	320 0.8×	93 0.5×	117 0.7×	99 0.6×	41 0.5×	16	556
Jenni L. McDonald	243 0.6×	183 1.0×	231 1.3×	61 0.4×	90 1.1×	13	581
Adrian H. Farmer	556 1.4×	158 0.9×	119 0.7×	102 0.6×	73 0.9×	31	646
Joel O. Abraham	306 0.8×	156 0.9×	133 0.7×	59 0.3×	75 0.9×	16	579
Alberto J. Alaniz	185 0.5×	141 0.8×	163 0.9×	105 0.6×	175 2.2×	54	599

Countries citing papers authored by M. Philip Nott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Philip Nott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Philip Nott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Philip Nott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Philip Nott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Philip Nott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Philip Nott. The network helps show where M. Philip Nott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Philip Nott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Philip Nott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Philip Nott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Philip Nott. M. Philip Nott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact