M. Nio

4.0k citations
37 papers · 2.5k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 24

M. Nio

37 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Theory of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of ...3392012202620162021100200300400

Peers

M. Nio
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.8k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 814
  • Radiation 195
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 154
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 285
Replace David Hanneke with:
David Hanneke United States
Tatsumi Aoyama Japan
J. Walz Germany
H. Grotch United States
E. N. Fortson United States
Robert S. Van Dyck United States
N. Kolachevsky Russia
P. B. Schwinberg United States
E. A. Hessels Canada
Michael I. Eides Russia
M. Nio relative to David Hanneke United States David Hanneke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David Hanneke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Nio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Nio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Nio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Nio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Nio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Nio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Nio. The network helps show where M. Nio may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside M. Nio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Nio Line = papers co-authored together M. Nio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20255
2 2012230
3 201217
4 201218
5 201228
6 201126
7 201023
8 200831
9 200834
10 200783
11 20077
12 200720
13 2006180
14 20062
15 200344
16 20011
17 199918
18
Higher Order QED Corrections to the Hyperfine Structure of the Muonium
19951
19 199213
20 19925

About M. Nio

M. Nio is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Mechanics of Materials and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (25 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (15 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (13 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (8 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (7 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (7 papers), Muon and positron interactions and applications (6 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.8k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (814 citations), Radiation (195 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (154 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (285 citations). M. Nio has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include T. Kinoshita, Tatsumi Aoyama, Masashi Hayakawa, Takuya Aoyama, Brian Odom, G. Gabrielse, David Hanneke, Tadayoshi Aoyama, H. Kawai and Yuko Okamoto. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. D, Progress of Theoretical Physics, Nuclear Physics B and Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026