M. Malek

19.3k total citations
12 papers, 137 citations indexed

About

M. Malek is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Malek has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 137 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Radiation and 2 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in M. Malek's work include Neutrino Physics Research (5 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (5 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (4 papers). M. Malek is often cited by papers focused on Neutrino Physics Research (5 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (5 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (4 papers). M. Malek collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. M. Malek's co-authors include Richard A. Greene, Pankaj Garg, Mary Baker, R. Meyhandan, M. Mostafá, Brian Fick, P. Sommers, Lawrence Wiencke, M. S. Roberts and J. Matthews and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical review. D, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

In The Last Decade

M. Malek

10 papers receiving 125 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Malek United Kingdom 5 75 51 43 15 11 12 137
L. Paffrath United States 6 12 0.2× 14 0.3× 34 0.8× 11 0.7× 9 0.8× 17 67
V. Danielyan Germany 5 4 0.1× 27 0.5× 32 0.7× 7 0.5× 6 0.5× 19 80
R. Nartallo United Kingdom 8 9 0.1× 39 0.8× 54 1.3× 4 0.3× 5 0.5× 14 165
R. Le Gac France 6 18 0.2× 17 0.3× 89 2.1× 24 2.2× 12 105
T. Toyama Germany 6 6 0.1× 28 0.5× 22 0.5× 6 0.4× 74 6.7× 10 115
C. Delgado Mendez Spain 5 4 0.1× 13 0.3× 44 1.0× 4 0.3× 16 1.5× 24 89
C. Avanzini Italy 5 5 0.1× 25 0.5× 72 1.7× 2 0.1× 14 1.3× 20 109
R. Gran United States 6 10 0.1× 6 0.1× 146 3.4× 2 0.1× 8 0.7× 12 165
R. J. Hoyland Spain 8 5 0.1× 37 0.7× 50 1.2× 8 0.5× 12 1.1× 29 166
D. Ikeda Japan 8 3 0.0× 9 0.2× 156 3.6× 9 0.6× 4 0.4× 47 181

Countries citing papers authored by M. Malek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Malek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Malek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Malek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Malek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Malek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Malek. The network helps show where M. Malek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Malek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Malek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Malek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Malek. M. Malek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
2.
Schnellbach, Y. J., et al.. (2024). Supernova model discrimination with a kilotonne-scale Gd-H2O Cherenkov detector. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2024(1). 4–4. 1 indexed citations
3.
Armitage, J.C., et al.. (2023). Sensitivity of an Antineutrino Monitor for Remote Nuclear Reactor Discovery. Physical Review Applied. 20(3). 1 indexed citations
4.
Foster, Robert, et al.. (2023). Characterisation of the temperature-dependent dark rate of Hamamatsu R7081-100 10” photomultiplier tubes. Journal of Instrumentation. 18(8). P08017–P08017.
5.
Smy, M. B., et al.. (2023). Coincidence-based reconstruction for reactor antineutrino detection in gadolinium-doped Cherenkov detectors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1053. 168375–168375. 1 indexed citations
6.
Dalmasson, J., G. Gratta, A. Jamil, et al.. (2018). Distributed imaging for liquid scintillation detectors. Physical review. D. 97(5). 5 indexed citations
7.
Cowan, G. A., F. Muheim, M. Needham, et al.. (2017). Characterisation and testing of a prototype 6×6 cm2 Argonne MCP-PMT. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 876. 80–83. 2 indexed citations
8.
Henry, S. G. B., H. Kraus, M. Malek, V.B. Mikhailik, & G. Waysand. (2008). SQUID magnetometry for the cryoEDM experiment—Tests at LSBB. Journal of Instrumentation. 3(11). P11003–P11003. 8 indexed citations
9.
Henry, S., N. Bazin, H. Kraus, et al.. (2007). The 66-channel SQUID readout for CRESST II. Journal of Instrumentation. 2(11). P11003–P11003. 7 indexed citations
10.
Fick, Brian, M. Malek, J. Matthews, et al.. (2006). The Central Laser Facility at the Pierre Auger Observatory. Journal of Instrumentation. 1(11). P11003–P11003. 34 indexed citations
11.
Malek, M.. (2004). SUPERNOVA RELIC NEUTRINO SEARCH RESULTS FROM SUPER-KAMIOKANDE. 51–56. 1 indexed citations
12.
Garg, Pankaj, et al.. (2003). Using IEEE 802.11e MAC for QoS over wireless. 537–542. 77 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026