M. M. Block

4.8k total citations
135 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

M. M. Block is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, M. M. Block has authored 135 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 102 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 25 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 10 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in M. M. Block's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (80 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (76 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (54 papers). M. M. Block is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (80 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (76 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (54 papers). M. M. Block collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Italy. M. M. Block's co-authors include F. Halzen, R. N. Cahn, Loyal Durand, Phuoc Ha, Douglas W. McKay, R.H. Dalitz, B. Margolis, E. Harth, Martin Holthaus and D. T. King and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Reviews of Modern Physics and Physics Reports.

In The Last Decade

M. M. Block

129 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. M. Block United States 29 2.4k 436 147 112 104 135 2.7k
H. DeStaebler United States 16 1.9k 0.8× 325 0.7× 104 0.7× 126 1.1× 124 1.2× 36 2.2k
P. Söding Germany 22 2.9k 1.2× 428 1.0× 130 0.9× 184 1.6× 65 0.6× 52 3.3k
T. T. Chou United States 18 1.7k 0.7× 287 0.7× 106 0.7× 82 0.7× 55 0.5× 42 2.0k
A. Donnachie United Kingdom 33 3.6k 1.5× 387 0.9× 73 0.5× 159 1.4× 85 0.8× 130 3.8k
E. J. Moniz United States 21 1.7k 0.7× 630 1.4× 142 1.0× 222 2.0× 57 0.5× 56 2.1k
P. Darriulat Switzerland 23 1.3k 0.6× 340 0.8× 214 1.5× 192 1.7× 90 0.9× 93 1.8k
D. H. Coward United States 18 2.0k 0.9× 269 0.6× 60 0.4× 124 1.1× 87 0.8× 29 2.3k
T. Fields United States 27 1.5k 0.6× 282 0.6× 108 0.7× 93 0.8× 53 0.5× 81 1.7k
H. Pilkuhn Germany 20 2.0k 0.9× 704 1.6× 78 0.5× 140 1.3× 77 0.7× 87 2.4k
C. Bricman Switzerland 17 2.2k 0.9× 334 0.8× 90 0.6× 176 1.6× 59 0.6× 37 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by M. M. Block

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. M. Block's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. M. Block with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. M. Block more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. M. Block

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. M. Block. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. M. Block. The network helps show where M. M. Block may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. M. Block

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. M. Block. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. M. Block based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. M. Block. M. M. Block is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schultz, Don E. & M. M. Block. (2017). Consumer research, retailers and robots. International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing. 8(2). 172–172. 2 indexed citations
2.
Anchordoqui, Luis A., M. M. Block, Loyal Durand, et al.. (2017). Evidence for a break in the spectrum of astrophysical neutrinos. Physical review. D. 95(8). 23 indexed citations
3.
Block, M. M., Loyal Durand, & Phuoc Ha. (2014). Connection of the virtualγ*pcross section ofepdeep inelastic scattering to realγpscattering, and the implications forνNandeptotal cross sections. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 89(9). 49 indexed citations
4.
Block, M. M., Loyal Durand, Phuoc Ha, & Douglas W. McKay. (2013). Implications of a Froissart bound saturation ofγ*pdeep inelastic scattering. II. Ultrahigh energy neutrino interactions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 88(1). 18 indexed citations
5.
Block, M. M. & F. Halzen. (2011). Experimental Confirmation that the Proton is Asymptotically a Black Disk. Physical Review Letters. 107(21). 212002–212002. 40 indexed citations
6.
Block, M. M., Loyal Durand, & Douglas W. McKay. (2009). Analytic treatment of leading-order parton evolution equations: Theory and tests. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 79(1). 25 indexed citations
7.
Berger, Edmond L., M. M. Block, Douglas W. McKay, & Chung-I Tan. (2007). Ultra-high energy neutrino scattering on an isoscalar nucleon. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations
8.
Block, M. M., et al.. (2006). Analyticity constraints on the Landshoff-Donnachie fit to total cross sections. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 74(11).
9.
Block, M. M. & F. Halzen. (2005). Publisher’s Note: New evidence for the saturation of the Froissart bound [Phys. Rev. D72, 036006 (2005)]. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 72(3). 9 indexed citations
10.
Weiß, Christoph, et al.. (2004). Ground-State Energy of a Weakly Interacting Bose Gas: Calculation Without Regularization. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A. 59(1-2). 1–13. 4 indexed citations
11.
Block, M. M. & Martin Holthaus. (2002). Pseudopotential approximation in a harmonic trap. Physical Review A. 65(5). 42 indexed citations
12.
Block, M. M. & Alan R. White. (1994). Proceedings of the XXIII International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics : Aspen, Colorado, USA, 12-17 September 1993. WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks. 1 indexed citations
13.
Block, M. M., Robert Samuel Fletcher, F. Halzen, B. Margolis, & P. Valin. (1990). Theoretical implications of Fermilab Tevatron total and elastic differential-cross-section measurements. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 41(3). 978–981. 39 indexed citations
14.
Block, M. M.. (1986). Aspen Winter Physics Conference, 1st, Aspen, CO, Jan. 6-19, 1985, Proceedings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 461.
15.
Block, M. M. & R. N. Cahn. (1983). Near forward p p andp¯ p elastic scattering: Slope analysis of existing data. Physics Letters B. 120(1-3). 229–232. 14 indexed citations
16.
Böhm, A., A. Kernan, J. G. Layter, et al.. (1978). Meson-Resonance Production inppInteractions at 53-GeV (c.m.) Energy. Physical Review Letters. 41(26). 1761–1764. 5 indexed citations
17.
Block, M. M.. (1967). The electromagnetic form factor of the pion. Physics Letters B. 25(10). 604–607. 20 indexed citations
18.
Block, M. M., E. B. Brucker, R. Gessaroli, et al.. (1961). K− absorption in4He. Il Nuovo Cimento. 20(4). 724–732. 14 indexed citations
19.
Block, M. M., et al.. (1958). π+pInteractions in the Energy Range around 500 Mev. Physical Review. 112(4). 1287–1294. 16 indexed citations
20.
Block, M. M., et al.. (1952). Excitation Function for Chargedπ-Meson Production in Hydrogen and Carbon by 345- to 380-Mev Protons. Physical Review. 88(6). 1247–1253. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026